Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

S Ananth vs State Of Karnataka on 14 July, 2014

Bench: K.L.Manjunath, Ravi Malimath

                         1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2014

                     PRESENT

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH

                        AND

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

              W.P.H.C. NO. 131 OF 2014

BETWEEN:

S.ANANTH
AGED 27 YEARS
S/O SHANMUGHAM
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
NO.107, 1ST FLOOR, MANYA AREA
SY.NO.4/2, NYNAPPANAHALLI
BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560 068
                                     ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI: ARJUN REGO, ADVOCATE, FOR
     M/S. REGO & REGO, ADVOCATES)

AND:

  1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
     BY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
     INFANTRY ROAD
     BANGALORE - 560 001

  2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
     BY HSR LAYOUT P.S.
     H.S.R.LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 034
                      2




3. MR.S.SIVASAMY
   AGED 50 YEARS
   FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
   THE PETITIONER
   RESIDENT OF NO.1-204/NA
   EACHAMPALLAM
   MEERKUPATHY AVINASHI TALUK
   TIRPUR DISTRICT, TIRPUR - 638 103
   AND ALSO RESIDING AT
   DOOR NO.3, OM SHAKTHI KOVIL STREET
   4TH KONGU NAGAR, TIRPUR - 638 103
   (PHONE NO.98429 54676)

4. MRS.MALLIKA
   AGED 45 YEARS
   RESIDENT OF NO.1-204/NA
   EACHAMPALLAM
   MEERKUPATHY AVINASHI TALUK
   TIRPUR DISTRICT, TIRPUR - 638 103
   AND ALSO RESIDING AT
   DOOR NO.3, OM SHAKTHI KOVIL STREET
   4TH KONGU NAGAR, TIRPUR - 638 103
   (PHONE NO.9942663200)

5. MR.MOHAN RAJ
   AGED 40 YEARS
   FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
   THE PETITIONER
   RESIDENT OF NO.1-204/NA
   EACHAMPALLAM
   MEERKUPATHY AVINASHI TALUK
   TIRPUR DISTRICT, TIRPUR - 638 103
   AND ALSO RESIDING AT
   DOOR NO.3, OM SHAKTHI KOVIL STREET
   4TH KONGU NAGAR, TIRPUR - 638 103
   (PHONE NO.9965003589)
                      3




6. MR.IRSHAD
   AGED 45 YEARS
   FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
   THE PETITIONER
   RESIDENT OF NO.1-204/NA
   EACHAMPALLAM
   MEERKUPATHY AVINASHI TALUK
   TIRPUR DISTRICT, TIRPUR - 638 103
   AND ALSO RESIDING AT
   DOOR NO.3, OM SHAKTHI KOVIL STREET
   4TH KONGU NAGAR, TIRPUR - 638 103
   (PHONE NO.9171665131)

7. MR.ASLAM
   AGED 34 YEARS
   FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
   THE PETITIONER
   RESIDENT OF NO.1-204/NA
   EACHAMPALLAM
   MEERKUPATHY AVINASHI TALUK
   TIRPUR DISTRICT, TIRPUR - 638 103
   AND ALSO RESIDING AT
   DOOR NO.3, OM SHAKTHI KOVIL STREET
   4TH KONGU NAGAR, TIRPUR - 638 103
   (PHONE NO.9843320150)

8. MR.KARAN
   AGED 27 YEARS
   FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
   THE PETITIONER
   RESIDENT OF NO.1-204/NA
   EACHAMPALLAM
   MEERKUPATHY AVINASHI TALUK
   TIRPUR DISTRICT, TIRPUR - 638 103
   AND ALSO RESIDING AT
   DOOR NO.3, OM SHAKTHI KOVIL STREET
   4TH KONGU NAGAR, TIRPUR - 638 103
                             4




  9. MR.VEERA BOOSS
     AGED 34 YEARS
     FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
     THE PETITIONER
     PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
     NO.166/4, POLICE QUARTERS
     MANDABAM CAMP
     RAMANATHAPURAM
     MANDAPAM - 613 518
     (PHONE NO.9443387323)
                                     ...RESPONDENTS
  (BY SRI: E S INDIRESH, HCGP, FOR R-1 & R-2)

     THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING
THE RESPODNENTS TO PRODUCE MRS.S.PAVITHRA
BEFORE THIS COURT.

     THIS WPHC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
K.L.MANJUNATH, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

                        ORDER

Wife of the petitioner Mrs. S.Pavithra is produced before the court by H.S.R. Police Station through Woman Police Constable - Amitha (WPC-10333).

2. On interrogation by the court, the detenue is willing to go with the petitioner. She further submits that she is married to him and she has not objection to live with him.

5

3. The parents of the detenue are also present before the court, who are respondent Nos. 3 and 4. They have no objection for their daughter to go and stay with her husband.

4. In case, if any cohersive steps are taken up by the parents and relatives of the detenue, the H.S.R. Layout police are directed to give protection to the petitioner and also his wife. In such an event, the matter would be viewed seriously by this court.

With the above observations, this petition is closed.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE Bsv