Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Ram Pyare Mistri vs Smt. Daso Devi & Ors on 1 February, 2016

Author: Anjana Prakash

Bench: Anjana Prakash

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                                           Criminal Revision No.307 of 2014
                         Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)
                 ===========================================================
                 Ram Pyare Mistri, son of Late Gopi Mistri, Resident of Village -Telhara, P.S.-
                 Ekangarsarai, Telhara, District- Nalanda.
                                                                                .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 1. Smt. Daso Devi, wife of Late Hari Mistri
                 2. Ram Sevak Mistri
                 3. Mohan Mistri
                 4. Sohan Mistri
                     O.P No. 2 to 4 are son of Late Hari Mistri
                     All Resident of Village -Telhara, P.S.-Ekangarsarai, Telhara, District- Nalanda.
                 5. State of Bihar
                                                                               .... .... Respondent/s
                 ===========================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s :      Mr. Ashok Kumar
                 For the Respondent/s :      Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1 (APP)
                 ===========================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH
                 ORAL JUDGMENT

Date: 01-02-2016 The petitioner seeks revision of the order 19.12.2005, passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa (Nalanda) in Criminal Revision No. 38 of 2000, setting aside the order dated 03.06.2010, passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate Hilsa on the ground that it was not public Rasta in case no. 88/MP/92 Trial No. 44/1999, without hearing the petitioner.

Since the matter is of the year 1992, I would not think it proper to interfere in the same. However, the Revisional Court is directed to call for a report and pass a fresh order after hearing both the parties within three weeks of the date of receipt of the report.

With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of.


                                                       (Anjana Prakash, J)

brajesh/-sunil

  U          T