Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore

M/S.Islamic Academy Of Education (R), ... vs Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 3 May, 2017

        IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
             CIRCUIT BENCH AT MANGALURU


 BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                       AND
   SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER


                  ITA No.2056/Bang/2016
                (Assessment year: 2007-08)


Islamic Academy of Education (R),
2-331/12, YMDC Campus,
Nithyananda Nagar, Deralkatte,
Mangaluru.                                     ...      Appellant

        Vs.

Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax
 (Exemptions)
Circle 1,
Mangaluru.                                     ...   Respondent


      Appellant by : Shri P.Dinesh, Advocate
      Respondent : Shri R.N.Siddappaji, Addl.CIT &
                     Shri S.Sreenivasan, DCIT (DRs)


     Date of hearing             :    03/02/2017
     Date of pronouncement       :    03/05/2017


                         O   R       D E   R


Per INTURI RAMA RAO, AM :

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the CIT(A), Mangalore, dated 22/09/2016 for the assessment year 2007-08.

2. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal: ITA No.2056/Bang/2016 Page 2 of 3

3. The only issue arising in the present appeal is whether the assessee was entitled to adjust the seized cash as a result of search and seizure operation against existing tax liability and the assessee was entitled to interest on balance money.

3. After considering the rival submissions and material on record, we are of the considered opinion that the AO was empowered to adjust cash seized as a result of search and seizure operation against the tax due. As regards entitlement of ITA No.2056/Bang/2016 Page 3 of 3 interest on balance money remaining after adjustment against dues, as per ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of CIT vs. G.B.Transports (158 ITR 548) and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals (358 ITR 291), the assessee is only entitled to interest as provided under the statute. Since provisions of the Act do not provide any interest on seized money, assessee is not entitled to any interest.

4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 03nd May, 2017 sd/- sd/-

(SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Place: Bengaluru.

Date: 03/05/2017 Srinivasulu, Sr. PS Copy to:

     1)    Appellant
     2)    Respondent
     3)    CIT(A)
     4)    CIT,
     5)    DR ITAT, Bangalore,
     6)    Guard file

                                          Assistant Registrar
                                     Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
                                              Bangalore