Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Sun Tv Network Ltd vs M/S.Gokann International Media ... on 26 September, 2019

Author: N.Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                              C.S.No.405 of 2019

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 26.09.2019

                                                     CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                              C.S.No.405 of 2019
                                                     and
                                              O.P.No.648 of 2019

                      M/s.Sun TV Network Ltd., Rep., by its
                      Authorised Signatory, Mr.M.Jyothi Basu,
                      Murasoli Maran Towers,
                      73, MRC Nagar Main Road,
                      MRC Nagar, Chennai-600 028.                                  .. Plaintiff

                                                       -vs-

                      M/s.Gokann International Media Limited,
                      Rep., by its Director,
                      No.5, 15th Cross Street, Chowdry Nagar,
                      Valasaravakkam, Chennai-600 087.                          .. Defendant


                            Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules r/w
                      Section 2(1)(c) XVII r/w 1st proviso of Section 7 of Commercial Courts,
                      Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts
                      Act, 2015 (Act 4 of 2016) r/w Sections 55 & 62 of the Copyrights Act &
                      Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure for the following judgment
                      and decree:-
                            (a) For permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their
                      men, representatives, agents and anybody on behalf of the defendant
                      from in any manner infringing, exhibiting or exploiting the Schedule
                      “A” movies or any part thereof through satellite Television Broadcast


                      1/5


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                        C.S.No.405 of 2019

                      Direct to Home broadcast, direct satellite service, internet video
                      streaming through all forms, I.P. TV, broadband, telephone,
                      telephony, cell phone radio (all dimensions) VCD, DVD, video on
                      demand, movie on demand, video, High definition (HD), laser disc,
                      blue ray, U-matic, inflight, airborne, railborne, terrestrial television
                      broadcast (all dimensions) through cable/via cable TV, local delivery
                      system, MMDS, paper view, seaborne, all modes of public/private
                      transportation, public service broadcasting, private communication/
                      broadcast, wire, wireless, 2D & 3D formats/dimensions of the film or
                      any other formats/dimensions which may be in existence now or
                      invented in future or through any other forms, means and modes and
                      any forms of communication like signs, signals, writing, pictures,
                      images and sounds of all kinds of transmission of electro magnetic
                      waves through space or through cables intended to be received by the
                      general public either directly or indirectly through the medium of relay
                      stations and all its grammatical variations and cognate expressions
                      shall be constructed accordingly or any other systems without
                      restriction   of   geographical   area    and   including   all     channels     of
                      Doordarshan, in 7s Music (A unit of M/s.Gokann International Media
                      Limited), or any other TV channel owned and run by the defendant;
                            (b) To direct the defendant to render true and proper accounts of
                      profit in respect of its infringing, telecasting and exploiting of the said
                      Schedule “A' movies since April, 2019;
                            (c) To pay damages of a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- for exploiting the
                      Schedule “A' movies as detailed in Schedule “B' hereunder thereby
                      causing loss to the plaintiff; and
                            (d) to pay cost to the plaintiff.


                      2/5


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                  C.S.No.405 of 2019


                               For Plaintiff       :            Ms.M.Sneha

                               For Defendant       :            Mr.L.Sharadh Kumar,
                                                                For Mr.RA.Chinnarajah

                                                        ******

                                                       JUDGMENT

This suit is for permanent injunction filed on the ground that the defendant has telecasted the movie in respect of which the plaintiff has copyrights.

2.Learned counsel for the defendant would submit that without the knowledge of plaintiff possessing the copyrights, the defendant has telecasted the movie and hereafter, they will not telecast the movies for which the plaintiff has copyrights.

3.In view of the said submission, this Court is of the view that the suit itself can be disposed of in terms of the submission of the learned counsel for the defendant. Judgment can be passed on admission in the pleadings or otherwise in terms of Order 12 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure.

3/5

http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.405 of 2019

4.Learned counsel for the plaintiff fairly submits that if the defendant undertakes not to telecast the movies for which the plaintiff has copyrights, they are not inclined to make any claim for damages.

5.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the defendant, the suit is decreed as prayed for, so far as prayer (a) is concerned.

6.In respect of the other reliefs, the suit is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected original petition is closed.

26.09.2019 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order abr 4/5 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.405 of 2019 N.Sathish Kumar, J.

(abr) C.S.No.405 of 2019 26.09.2019 5/5 http://www.judis.nic.in