Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Madras High Court

Godavarty Sundaramma vs Godavarty Mangamma on 15 November, 1916

Equivalent citations: (1918)34MLJ558

JUDGMENT

1. The report of the District Munsif now received places it beyond doubt that the portion of Survey No. 304, which is part of the subject-matter of the suit, has not been subdivided and separately assessed to land revenue.

2. It cannot therefore be valued under Clause (b) of Section 7(v) of the Court Fees Act. The order of the learned Judge is clearly right.

3. The appeal must be dismissed with costs.