Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Mr.M. Ramadoss vs Mr.A. Anbu Abraham on 18 August, 2023

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                                                 Cont.P.No.326 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED: 18.08.2023

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                  Cont.P.No.326 of 2023


                   Mr.M. Ramadoss                                                   ... Petitioner


                                                             Vs.

                   Mr.A. Anbu Abraham,
                   The Managing Director,
                   Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited,
                   Pallavan House, Anna Salai,
                   Chennai – 600 002.                                               ... Respondent

                   Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
                   Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for his wilful
                   disobedience of the order dated 10.10.2022, passed by this Court in
                   WP.No.26861 of 2022 under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act,
                   1971.


                                     For Petitioner      : Mr.S.R. Karthikeyan

                                     For Respondent      : Mr.A. Vinoth Raj




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                   1/4
                                                                             Cont.P.No.326 of 2023



                                                        ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has placed before this Court the order of the respondent dated 08.08.2023, in compliance with the directions given by this Court which is the subject matter of this Contempt Petition.

2. The order dated 08.08.2023 has also been sent to the petitioner which has been returned with an endorsement 'No such person'. A Xerox copy of the returned order with an endorsement has also been produced before this Court by the learned counsel for the respondent.

3. However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 08.08.2023 does not amount to full compliance of the order passed by this Court.

4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 08.08.2023, he will have to challenge the same in the manner known to him under law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4 Cont.P.No.326 of 2023

5. Since the order of this Court dated 10.10.2022 passed in WP.No.26861 of 2022, which is the subject matter of this Contempt Petition, has been complied with by the respondent, this Contempt Petition stands closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 08.08.2023 passed by the respondent in the manner known to him under law.

18.08.2023 Index: Yes/ No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No Sni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4 Cont.P.No.326 of 2023 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Sni Cont.P.No.326 of 2023 18.08.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4