Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Puducherry Body Builders & Fitness ... vs The Government Of India on 24 April, 2025

Author: D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Bench: D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

    2025:MHC:1133



                                                                                      W.P.No.14635 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 24.04.2025

                                                         CORAM:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                              W.P.No.14635 of 2025
                                                      and
                                             W.M.P.No.16520 of 2025

                  PUDUCHERRY BODY BUILDERS & FITNESS ASSOCIATION,
                  REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY,
                  J. VICTOR JAGANATHAN AMBOROISE,
                  NO.16, KURINJI STREET,
                  GANAPATHI NAGAR,
                  MURUGAPAKKAM,
                  PUDUCHERRY - 605 004.                                                   ... Petitioner

                                                              Vs

                  1.        THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
                            MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS,
                            REP. BY UNDER SECRETARY,
                            SHASTRI BHAVAN,
                            NEW DELHI - 110 001.

                  2.        THE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY,
                            REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
                            CHEIF SECRETARIAT, GOUBERT AVENUE,
                            PUDUCHERRY - 605 001.

                  3.        DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS AND YOUTH AFFAIRS,
                            GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY,
                            REP. BY THE SECRETARY,
                            CHIEF SECRETARIAT,
                            GOUBERT AVENUE,
                            PUDUCHERRYY - 605 001.

                  4.        PUDUCHERRY STATE SPORTS COUNCIL,
                            INDIRA GANDHI SPORTS COMPLEX,
                            UPPALAM,


                  1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm )
                                                                                        W.P.No.14635 of 2025

                            PUDUCHERRY - 605 001.

                  5.        DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
                            UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY,
                            NO.4, DUMAS STREET,
                            PUDUCHERRY - 605 001.

                  6.        P.K.SIVANESAN,


                  7.        MANIKANDAPRABU


                  8.        S. JEGANATHAN
                                                                                        ... Respondents

                  Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the
                  issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 1st to 5th respondents from
                  allowing the 6th to 8th respondents or any others to conduct any sports event
                  in the name and style of or using the name of "Mr.India" and "Open Mr.South
                  India" or "National" at Rock Beach, Puducherry on 03.05.2025 and at Karaikal
                  Beach on 25.05.2025 or any other subsequent date or dates and place by
                  considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2025.


                                  For Petitioner             : Mr.P.Suresh Babu
                                  For R1                    : Mr.A.S.Vijayaragavan
                                                              Senior Panel Counsel
                                                              (Government of India)

                                  For R2 to R5              : Mr.R.Sreedhar
                                                              Additional Government Pleader




                  2/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm )
                                                                                         W.P.No.14635 of 2025

                                                             ORDER

The writ petition is filed with a prayer forbearing the 1st to 5th respondents from allowing the 6th to 8th respondents or any others to conduct any sports event in the name and style of or using the name “Mr. India” and “Open Mr. South India” or “National,” at Rock Beach, Puducherry on 03.05.2025 and at Karaikal Beach on 25.05.2025 or any other subsequent date or dates.

2. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perusing the affidavit filed by the petitioner association, it can be seen that on the said dates, the private associations run by the respondents 6 to 8 seem to be conducting a bodybuilding competition. They’ve advertised the competition as “Open Mr.South India 4th Fitness Zone Classic 2025, Bodybuilding & Fitness Competition” and “8th Mr.Kanagasabai Classic- 2025, Mr. India”.

3. The writ petition is filed on the premise that when the advertisement contains the words Mr.India and Open Mr.South India, etc., the same is violative of Section 3 of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 (Act No.12 of 1950).

3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm ) W.P.No.14635 of 2025

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also relied upon an interim order granted by this Court in W.P. No. 33576 of 2024. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is liable to be allowed by this Court.

5. Mr.A.S.Vijayaragavan, the learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 to 5 would submit that the competition is run by private organizations and they have got nothing to do with the matter.

6. As far as the order passed in the earlier writ petition is concerned, it can be seen that it is an interim order passed on the consent of parties in the said case. The only question to be decided by the Court is whether the impugned action is violative of Section 3 of Act No. 12 of 1950. In this regard, Section 3 is extracted hereunder:

“3. Prohibition of improper use of certain emblems and names.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, no person shall, except in such cases and under such conditions as may be prescribed by the Central Government, use or continue to use, for the purpose of any trade, business, calling or profession, or in the tile of any patent, or in any trade mark or design, any name or emblem specified in the Schedule or any colourable imitation thereof without the previous permission of the Central Government or such officer of 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm ) W.P.No.14635 of 2025 Government as may be authorised in this behalf by the Central Government.”

7. Thus, it can be seen that the nation’s name or emblem cannot be used in any trade, business, calling or profession, or in the title of any patent, or in any trademark or design or any name or emblem specified in the Schedule or any colourable imitation thereof, without the previous permission of the Central Government. As far as the concerned sport of bodybuilding is concerned, it is common knowledge that whoever wins the competition is called Mr. or Ms. South India or India or World. That is common and specific to the said sport. That does not in any manner mean that it is the use of any national emblem or name of the country for any trade, business, calling or profession. It is synonymously used to refer to the title winner of such bodybuilding competitions. The Sport is conducted to encourage physical fitness among individuals. I do not see the same as in any manner violative of Section 3 of the said Act.

8. In view thereof, I am unable to accede to the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Finding no merits, the writ petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm ) W.P.No.14635 of 2025 24.04.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes nsl To

1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS, REP. BY UNDER SECRETARY, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110 001.

2. THE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, CHEIF SECRETARIAT, GOUBERT AVENUE, PUDUCHERRY - 605 001.

3. DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS AND YOUTH AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, CHIEF SECRETARIAT, GOUBERT AVENUE, PUDUCHERRYY - 605 001.

4. PUDUCHERRY STATE SPORTS COUNCIL, INDIRA GANDHI SPORTS COMPLEX, UPPALAM, PUDUCHERRY - 605 001.

5. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY, NO.4, DUMAS STREET, PUDUCHERRY - 605 001 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm ) W.P.No.14635 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

nsl W.P.No.14635 of 2025 24.04.2025 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/05/2025 01:05:33 pm )