Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Anjali And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 31 July, 2020

Bench: Shashi Kant Gupta, Manju Rani Chauhan





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 32
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7180 of 2020
 

 
Petitioner :- Anjali And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Goyal
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.
 

Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.

This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 23.06.2020 in Case Crime No. 130 of 2020, under sections 363, 366 IPC and 7/8 Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Fatehabad, District Agra.

From the perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.

However, considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that alleged kidnapped girl namely Anjali shall be produced within 20 days from today before the Court concerned for recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. It is directed that in case the alleged kidnapped girl namely Anjali is produced within 20 days from today before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra (where she shall be identified by the first informant and the officer in charge of the police station concerned), she shall be produced before the C.M.O., Agra by the I.O. or the police officer concerned for her medical examination to determine her age etc.. Thereafter, on the application filed by the I.O. or the Officer In charge of the police station concerned, the statement of the alleged kidnapped girl Anjali shall be recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. by the C.J.M. concerned.

Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners.

In case, the alleged kidnapped girl namely Anjali appears to be major and does not support the prosecution story, the petitioner shall not be arrested till the submission of the police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. In case, the alleged kidnapped girl namely appears to be minor or supports the prosecution story, the petitioner may be arrested by the I.O. in accordance with law. In default of the production of the alleged kidnapped girl namely Anjali in the above mentioned case, the I.O. shall be free to make arrest of the petitioner.

With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.

Order Date :- 31.7.2020 JK Yadav