Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 4]

Patna High Court - Orders

Ranbir Prasad vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 29 June, 2011

Bench: Chief Justice, Birendra Prasad Verma

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Letters Patent Appeal No.899 of 2011
                                                      In
                                            CWJC No. 3942 of 2011
                 ======================================================
                 Ranbir Prasad, S/o Late Krishna Deo Sahu, R/o Village-Rasoolpur, P.O.-
                 Jandaha, P.S.-Jandaha, District-Vaishali. At present residing at Satpura
                 Road, Aghoriya Chowk, District-Muzaffarpur (Bihar).
                                                                          .... .... Appellant/s
                                                   Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of
                    Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
                 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of
                    Bihar, Patna.
                 3. The Agriculture Produce Commissioner, Department of Agriculture,
                    Government of Bihar, Patna.
                 4. The Director, Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, Government of
                    Bihar, Patna.
                 5. The Deputy Director, Administration, Department of Agriculture,
                    Government of Bihar, Patna
                 6. The District Agriculture Officer, Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi.
                 7. The State Advisory Committee, Bihar, Patna.
                 8. The Principal Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of
                    Bihar, Patna.
                 9. The Deputy Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of
                    Bihar, Patna.
                                                                         .... .... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s      :   Mr. B.K.Sinha and
                                              Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocates.
                 For the Respondent/s       : Mr. T.B.Singh, AAG-7
                                              Ms. S.Priya Pathak, AC to AAG-7.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                        and
                        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
                 ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)


3   29-06-2011

This Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is preferred by the appellant-writ petitioner against the order dated 19th April 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 3942 of 2011.

The appellant, a Block Agriculture Officer in the State of Bihar filed above CWJC No. 3942 of 2011 under Article Patna High Court LPA No.899 of 2011 (3) dt.29-06-2011 2 226 of the Constitution to challenge the legality of the order dated 18th October 2010 made by the Director of Agriculture, Bihar. The said order was made by the Director of Agriculture, Bihar in compliance with the order dated 20th August 2010 of the Government of India made under the powers conferred upon it by the Bihar State Reorganization Act, 2000. By the said order, on reorganization of the State of Bihar, the service of the appellant has been allocated to the State of Jharkhand. The challenge to the said order before the learned Single Judge has been rejected. Therefore, the present Appeal.

Learned Counsel Mr. B.K.Sinha has appeared for the appellant. He candidly admits that the impugned order of allocation has been made by the Director of Agriculture pursuant to the order made by the Government of India. The Government of India was, therefore, a necessary party to the writ petition, but the Government of India was not impleaded as party respondent to the writ petition. He has further submitted that the appellant is at the fag end of the service; his claim for compensation against the State of Bihar for accidental injury suffered by him in discharge of duty is also pending. In case, he is now called upon to join the State of Jharkhand, he will suffer immense prejudice.

We are of the view that the appellant has not made out any case that the impugned order of allocation of the appellant to the State of Jharkhand under the Bihar State Re-organization Act, 2000 is in any manner illegal. Moreover, the writ petition suffered from the vice of non-joinder of necessary party. The petition was, therefore, liable to be dismissed on that ground alone.

In the event the appellant has personal difficulty, the only remedy to the appellant would be a representation to the Patna High Court LPA No.899 of 2011 (3) dt.29-06-2011 3 Government of India. The legality of the order of allocation cannot be challenged on account of personal difficulty.

For the aforesaid reasons, the Appeal is dismissed in limine.




                                                      (R.M. Doshit, CJ)


Sujit/-                                        (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)