Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ramesh Chandra Rathore vs The State Of M.P.And Ors. on 26 September, 2022

Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia

Bench: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia

                                1
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          AT GWALIOR
                                BEFORE
             HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
                     ON THE 26th OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

                  WRIT PETITION No. 1008 of 2005

        BETWEEN:-
        RAMESH CHANDRA RATHORE AGED 49 YEARS,
        S/O LATE SHRI DHANIRAM RATHORE,
        OCCUPATION GOVERNMENT SERVICE, NAGAR
        PALIKA PARISHAD, GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                            .....PETITIONER
        (NONE FOR THE PETITIONER )

        AND
        1.       THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
        THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, NAGRIYA
        PRASHASAN EVAM VIKAS VIBHAG, BHOPAL
        (MADHYA PRADESH)
        2.    UP-SANCHALAK, NAGRIYA PRASHASAK
        MADHYA PRADESH SAMBHAG GWALIOR
        (MADHYA PRADESH).
        3.     NAGAR PANCHAYAT PICHHORE ZILA
        SHIVPURI, (MADHYA APRADESH) THROUGH
        MUKHYA NAGAR PALIKA ADHIKARI NAGAR
        PANCHAYAT PICHHORE, ZILA SHIVPURI.
        4.   NAGAR PALIKA KOLARAS, ZILA SHIPVURI
        MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH MUKHYA
        NAGAR PALIKA ADHIKARI, NAGAR PALIKA
        KOLARAS, ZILA SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH).
        5.        NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD, GUNA
        (MADHYA PRADESH) THROUGH MUKHYA
        NAGAR PALIKA, ADHIKARI, NAGAR PALIKA
        PARISHAD, GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                         .....RESPONDENTS
        (BY SHRI JITESH SHARMA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

      Th is petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
                                 ORDER

On 8.3.2018 none had appeared for the petitioner. On 18.2018 also none 2 had appeared for the petitioner and, accordingly, SPC was issued. Today, neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present.

Accordingly, it appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in prosecuting this petition.

It is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

(G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE (alok) ALOK KUMAR 2022.09.26 17:58:07 +05'30'