Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Antrix Financial Engineers Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India Through Department Of ... on 15 July, 2025

Author: M.S. Sonak

Bench: M.S. Sonak

   2025:BHC-OS:10922-DB                                                       14-WP-1936-2025-F.DOCX




                                                                                                          Amol
                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 1936 OF 2025
                             Antrix Financial Engineers Pvt Ltd                ...Petitioner
                                     Versus
                             Union of India thr. Dept. of Central
                             Goods & Service Tax Mumbai
                             East Commissionerate                 ...Respondent
                             ______________________________________________________
                             Mr Asim Naphade, with Ms Nishtha Malik, Ms Bijal Soni & Mr
                                  Tejas Horambe, i/b, NAS Legal Advocates, for the
                                  Petitioner.
                             ______________________________________________________

                                                           CORAM     M.S. Sonak &
                                                                     Jitendra Jain, JJ.
                                                           DATED:    15 July 2025
                             PC:-
         Digitally signed
         by AMOL

AMOL PREMNATH 1. Mr Naphade, based on instructions, seeks leave to PREMNATH JADHAV JADHAV Date:

2025.07.16 12:45:45 +0530 withdraw this Petition with liberty to raise all such contentions that have been raised in this Petition in response to the impugned show cause notice. He points out that in fact in the reply filed, such contentions have been raised and therefore, the Petitioner may be granted liberty to pursue such contentions.

2. Leave is granted with liberty as prayed for. All contentions of all parties are expressly left open.

3. This Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) Page 1 of 1 ::: Uploaded on - 16/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/08/2025 03:17:20 :::