Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Shaitan Singh Sankhla vs State Of Rajasthan on 29 July, 2021

Author: Vijay Bishnoi

Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

                                        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                                                         JODHPUR
                                                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6959/2021
                                   Shaitan Singh Sankhla S/o Shri Bhika Ram Ji, Aged About 66
                                   Years, R/o- Nayapura Lal Sagar, Mandore, Jodhpur (Raj.).
                                                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                                                       Versus
                                   1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Govt.
                                           Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
                                   2.      The Principal Secretary Water Resources Department,
                                           Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
                                   3.      The Joint Secretary, Finance (G And T) Department, Govt.
                                           Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
                                   4.      Addl. Secretary Cum Chief Engineer, Water Resource
                                           Department Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
                                   5.      Chief Engineer, Water Resources Zone, Rajasthan, Jaipur
                                           (Raj.).
                                   6.      Addl. Chief Engineer, Narmada Canal Project, Sanchore,
                                           Distt. Jalore (Raj.).
                                                                                                    ----Respondents


                                   For Petitioner            :     Mr. KK Shah


                                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Order 29/07/2021 Despite service of notices no one appeared on behalf of the respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite clear directions of the Finance Department not to levy additional performance security, the respondents are insisting the petitioner to pay the same.

In view of the above, the respondent No. 2 - Water resource Department is restrained from insisting the petitioner to pay additional performance security till next date.

List after two weeks.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J 206-pratibha/-

(Downloaded on 29/07/2021 at 09:01:38 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)