Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Allahabad High Court

Smt. Gayatri Devi vs State Of U.P. And Others on 1 November, 2010

Author: V.K. Shukla

Bench: V.K. Shukla





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 18
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 65186 of 2010
 

 
Petitioner :- Smt. Gayatri Devi
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- S. K. Pandey
 
Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.,G. S. Maurya,Mahesh Narain Singh,Shashi Kant Rai
 

 
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
 

Learned standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Sri Ghanshyam Maurya, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 6. Sri Mahesh Narain Singh and Sri D.K. Tripathi, holding brief of Sri S.K. Rai, Advocate, Advocates have entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.4 and 5 respectively.

Each one of the respondents is grnated six weeks' time to file conter affidavit. Rejoinderaffidavit may be filed within next two weeks.

List thereafter.

It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that in the present date Smt. Aradhna Mishra, respondent No.5 could not have submitted the disability certificate along with her application form till 07.01.2009, which was the last cut of date for submission of application form for selection and appointment on the post of Shikshamitra, as the said certificate itself was got issued on 12.01.2009, as such by no stretch of imagination, Smt. Aradhna Mishra could have been extended the benefit under the said category and at the most, she  could  have been treated as general candidate.

Prima facie the argument advanced appears to have some substance and requires consideration by this Court, as such till the next date of listing operation of order dated 07.08.2010 shall be kept in abeyance.

Order Date :- 1.11.2010 SRY