Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Ghurwa Ram @ Netu Chandrakar 2 ... on 5 August, 2019

                                 1
                                                    CRMP No. 2445 of 2018

                                                                   NAFR

        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                       CRMP No. 2445 of 2018

    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police                Station    Than
     Khamhariya ,district Bemetara Chhattisgarh.

                                                         ---- Petitioner

                              Versus

    Ghurwa Ram @ Netu Chandrakar S/o Leelaram Aged About 27
     Years R/o Village Gopalpur, Police Station Thankhamhariya
     District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.

                                                       ---- Respondent




For Petitioner/State           Ms. Fouzia Mirza, Additional Advocate
                               General




        DB:    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &

               Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Chourdiya


           Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

5/8/2019

1. Heard.

2. The trial Court has acquitted the accused of the charges under Sections 450, 376, 506-B of IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. PW-1 Kevri Chandrakar, mother of the prosecutrix, has admitted in para 5 of her cross-examination that the prosecutrix is her 2 CRMP No. 2445 of 2018 second daughter being one year younger to her eldest daughter, who is already married and has two children. She would admit that her eldest daughter is aged about 23-24 years. Thus, the prosecutrix was aged more than 18 years at the time of the incident as per the statement of her mother Kevri Chandrakar.

4. The prosecutrix was subjected to forcible sexual intercourse on atleast 5-6 occasions and the incident happened at her own house, when the accused used to visit her to maintain sexual relations. The prosecutrix did not reveal the incident to any of her relatives including her parents. PW-1 Kevri Chandrakar became aware of the prosecutrix's pregnancy of about 7 months, when she raised a doubt about the same while the prosecutrix was bathing in the house.

5. Considering the nature and quality of evidence available on record, no case for grant of leave to appeal is made out.

6. The CRMP is dismissed.

                 Sd/-                                      Sd/-


        ( Prashant Kumar Mishra)                     (Gautam Chourdiya)
               Judge                                       Judge




Shyna