Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Pam Developments Pvt Ltd vs The State Of West Bengal on 28 September, 2018

Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Indu Malhotra

                                                 1

     ITEM NO.55 + 59                    COURT NO.8                  SECTION XVI

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)       No(s).     22289/2018

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-08-2018
     in MC No. 45/2018 passed by the District Judge, Purba Medinipur,
     West Bengal in J. Misc. Case No. 45 of 2018)

     PAM DEVELOPMENTS PVT LTD.                                       Petitioner(s)

                                               VERSUS

     THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.                                 Respondent(s)

     WITH
     SLP(C) No. 24608/2018 (XVI)
     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

     WITH
     SLP(C) No. 25765/2018 (XVI)
     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

     Date : 28-09-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
                         HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA


     For Petitioner(s)             Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Adv.
                                   Mr. Priyankar Saha, Adv.
                                   Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR

     For Respondent(s)             Mr. Anand Grover, Sr.Adv.
                                   Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Adv.
                                   Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv.
                                   Mr. Abhishek Manchanda, Adv.
                                   Mr. Amit Verma, Adv.
                                   Ms. Kajal Dalal, Adv.
                                   M/s. Plr Chambers And Co., AOR

                                   Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr.Adv.
                                   Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                   Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.
                                   Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv.
Digitally signed by R
NATARAJAN
Date: 2018.10.01
17:07:02 IST
Reason:                            Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR
                                       2


       UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                              O R D E R
SLP (C) No. 22289/2018

The interim order dated 04.08.2018 states that unless a complete stay is granted, the application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 will itself be frustrated. Therefore, stay was granted till 01.09.2018, when the Section 34 petition was supposed to be heard.

The order is completely wrong in principle. It is clear that the Section 36 application is to be disposed of before Section 34 application.

We, thus, set aside the interim order and relegate the parties to the stage of the Section 36 application. It will be open for both the parties to take all points, including the point alleged before us by Mr. Anand Grover, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the State of West Bengal, as to the applicability of Order XXVII Rule 8A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. De-tag:

SLP (C) No. 24608/2018 and SLP (C) No. 25765/2018.



(MANAV SHARMA)                                 (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                     BRANCH OFFICER