Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sayyadsab Hazaratsab Bawakhan vs Siddappa Fakirappa Tilgangi on 10 September, 2013

Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda

Bench: A.N. Venugopala Gowda

                           1




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                    DHARWAD BENCH

       DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013

                       BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA

          WRIT PETITION NO.63355/2009 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SAYYADSAB HAZARATSAB BAWAKHAN
AGE:65 YEARS,
OCC:BUSINESS,
R/A NEAR OLD BUS STAND
SAUNDATTI.
DIST. BELGAUM.
                                        ... PETITIONER

    (BY SRI S.S. BAWAKHAN FOR            SRI     HEGDE,
NEERALAGI AND PATIL, ADVOCATES)

AND :

1.     SIDDAPPA FAKIRAPPA TILGANGI
       AGE: 51 YEARS,
       OCC:COMMISSION AGENT,
       R/A APMC YARD, HUBLI.
       DIST. DHARWAD.

2.     SHREE.RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED
       R/B ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
       B.C.105, HAVELOK ROAD,
       CANTONMENT, BELGAUM.

3.     KARVY COPUTERSHARE LTD.,
       (UNIT SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD)
       KARVY HOUSE 46,
                             2




     AVENUE 4, STREET NO.1
     BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD.
     ANDHARA PRADESH.

4.   I.U.SAMPAGAVI
     AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC:CLERK,
     R/A SHREE.RENUKA SUGARS LTD
     BRANCH OFFICE, DHARWAD.
     1ST FLOOR KALAKALESHWAR
     BUILDING, MALLIKARJUN NAGAR,
     DHARWAD.
                                       ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI S. V. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
    R2 & R2 ARE SERVED;
    R3 - NOTICE DISPENSED WITH             V/O.   DATED
09.09.2009)

      THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27/2/2009 PASSED BY THE
COURT OF THE 2ND ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE(JR.DN) DHARWAD
IN O.S.243/06 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:

                        ORDER

Sri S.S. Bawakhan, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition would not survive for consideration, since the suit has to be 3 disposed of, on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the parties.

2. Submission of the learned counsel is recorded and the petition is dismissed as not surviving for consideration.

Sd/-

JUDGE hnm/