Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Pradeep Rathod Son Of Parashuram Rathod ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 February, 2021

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                      Ganesh Lokhande                            1 of 6               7-ba-539-2021.doc




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 539 OF 2021
                      Pradeep Rathod
                      S/o Prakash Rathod & Anr.                              ...Applicants

                               Versus

                      The State of Maharashtra                               ...Respondent
                                                       .....
                      Ms. Anjali Awasthi a/w. Mr. Kaif Ansari a/w. Ms.Kavita Rathod,
                      Advocate for the Applicants.
                      Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent - State.
                      PSI-Ambhore, Chembur Police Station.
                      PSI-Liman Peravi, Chembur Police Station.
                                                       .....

                                                     CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                     DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2021.

                      PC :

                      1.                 This is an application for bail in connection with C.R.

                      No. 2 of 2021, registered with Chembur Police Station, Mumbai, for

                      the offences punishable under Sections 353, 354, 332, 323, 504,

                      509, 506, 188, 269 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC" for

                      short). Sections 112, 117 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.


                      2.                 The case of the prosecution is that on 1st January, 2021

                      the complainant and others were on duty. During the patrolling, they

                      were informed that some persons are fighting and people have
         Digitally
         signed by
         RajeP.
                      gathered at Chembur camp. On receipt of this information, the
RajeP.   Aher
Aher     Date:
         2021.02.26   complainant and other police personnel visited the place of incident.
         14:57:04
         +0530
 Ganesh Lokhande                          2 of 6              7-ba-539-2021.doc




They noticed that four to five persons were shouting and creating

ruckus. The complainant got down from the vehicle and enquired

with them, as to why they are shouting and why they have formed

assembly during the curfew period. At that time, one of the persons

charged at the complainant and abused complainant and others. The

accused abused the complainant and questioned her authority. She

was pushed by hurling abuses. Other persons threatened the

complainant and pulled her shirt by pushing her shoulder. The

complainant then called the police for assistance. Thereafter, other

police personnel reached the spot. Accused abused the complainant

and others. One of them assaulted, gave a blow on the chest of

women police constable and pushed the other constable. They kept

on abusing the police party. The accused twisted fingers of one of the

police constable. Accused were taken into custody. The complainant

was abused in filthy language and intimidated. One of the police

constable was assaulted with fist blow. The accused also threatened

that action will be taken against the police by Advocate Kavita

Rathod. The First Information Report (FIR) was registered.

Applicants were arrested and since they are in custody.


3.                Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the

false case has been registered against the applicants. They are in

custody from 2nd January, 2021. The Senior Inspector of Chembur
 Ganesh Lokhande                          3 of 6              7-ba-539-2021.doc




Police Station, is enmically disposed of against the aunt of the

applicants Smt. Kavita Rathod, who is an Advocate. Smt.Kavita

Rathod has lodged complaint against the Senior Inspector of Police

attached to the Chembur Police Station and during the enquiry, her

statements were recorded. Even she has been implicated in this case.

The accused was assaulted, which is evident from the medical

certificate. The Court has refused to grant police custody after

noticing that accused had complained about ill-treatment and

assaulted. The learned Magistrate has directed that the accused be

medically examined. Presently, applicants are in judicial custody.

Further detention of the applicants is not necessary. There are no

criminal antecedents against them. Applicant No.2 is student of law.


4.                Learned APP submitted that the FIR attributes serious

role to the accused. Conduct of the applicants was adamant. They

abused, assaulted and intimidated the complainant and other police

personnel. They also outraged modesty of one of the police

constable. Looking into this nature of incidents, applicants may not

be released on bail.


5.                I have perused the documents on record. The incident

had occurred on 1st January, 2021. The applicants were arrested on

2nd January, 2021. They are in judicial custody. Contention of the
 Ganesh Lokhande                      4 of 6                7-ba-539-2021.doc




applicants is that they are falsely implicated as the Senior Inspector

of Police attached to Chembur Police Station, is hostile towards

Advocate Kavita Rathod who is also implicated one of the accused in

this case. The applicants have placed on record the statement of

Advocate Kavita Rathod, recorded during the enquiry into complaint

lodged by her. It is also contended that the applicant No.2 is law

students and he had missed his law examination. Kavita Rathod had

preferred an application for anticipatory bail, which has been

allowed by the Sessions Court. It is also pertinent to note that the

applicants are not having any criminal antecedents. Learned counsel

for the applicants placed on record remand application and order

passed by the remand Court. The Order dated 2 nd January, 2021

passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate 67 Court Borivali,

refers to the fact that, on 2 nd January, 2021 arrested accused were

produced before the Court. They complained about assault by police.

Hence, medical examination is necessary. Remand Officer was

directed to conduct medical examination of the accused. It appears

that Prakash Rathod was medically examined and medical case

papers were placed on record. In Order dated 2 nd January, 2021

passed by the learned Magistrate it is mentioned that the accused

were again produced before the Court at about 1.40 hours. The

Court perused the medical report of accused and observed that there
 Ganesh Lokhande                               5 of 6                7-ba-539-2021.doc




is prima-facie substance in the complaint of the accused. The case

diary was perused, the remand officer was heard. Advocate was also

heard and it was observed that, taking into account the medical

report, it is not proper to grant police custody. Hence, accused were

remanded to judicial custody.


6.                  It is pertinent to note that the applicants are in custody

from 2nd January, 2021. They are in judicial custody. Further

detention is not necessary for any investigation. Hence on certain

conditions, bail can be granted to the applicants.


                                          ORDER

i) Bail Application No. 539 of 2021, is allowed;

ii) The applicants are directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. 2 of 2020, registered with Chembur Police Station, on executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with one or more sureties in the like amount;

iii) The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence;

iv) The applicants are permitted to furnish provisional Cash Bail Security in the sum of Ganesh Lokhande 6 of 6 7-ba-539-2021.doc Rs.20,000/- each for a period of eight weeks in lieu of surety;

v) Leave to amend to correct the name of both the applicants. Amendment may be carried out forthwith;

vi) The applicants shall report the concerned police station twice a month, on first Monday and Third Monday of month between 11.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. till filing of charge-sheet;

vii) Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly;

viii) This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)