Karnataka High Court
Tanveer Baig @ Tanveer vs State By Hunsur Town Police on 30 May, 2012
EN TEE EEGH CCEURT Q?' KARNATz'%§{E§. AT BEENGALSRE
§}:~'§;TED TRIS $33 39"? DAY GE" §\#E;'3:Y 2812
BEFORE? .. .
mg HONBLE MR JUSTICE K, N. KEsELaVAN§;RA$;x_§;;; _ A'
CRIMINAL PETITION Ne.2466 2013:' '% BETIVVEEN:
TAN'-VEER BAKE @ TANVEER, sxo BASEER BAIG, AGED ABOUT 2.5 YEARS, REESIDENG ATKHAJ1MOHALLA§ ' _ HUNSUR TOWN, . ..
MYSORE DISTRICT. ' ._ V ~ ";,PET:':'1©NER {BY SR1'C.MEJAGAQEEsHA,_g;,DVG:f;Aj'E§'~.. V ;A .. AND:
STATE BY. i_~IUNSUR--:'i1'fa§VJN' §«:;:;:<:.,I~;H REPRESENTEL*JB_Y ' _ _ PUBLIC }?RGSECUTQR; 'V STATE G§'~.E{£:RE\Tz3§§:i;E{}.&, HIGH <':QI5E<:<': B§j'EL£>iN:'},= BAi'éGE?LL;_§Z)RE.°= '-- WRES%POE%EDE":'§\§'1' * 3:3? Q1A;.:§L§R:Nii%A$;:*Rg$s%: Haw} .L ?§E'?'§'¥3§ ES F1233 {§§'§3ER SEZCTEGN %§'3€§ "~%',_;R,§?';§i"'f';~V§.,_ ?§F{f§EY1?%ES Ti} RELEASE YHE ?ET§?§GE'§EZ;Z?{ 93$ BAEE, EVE C§ii';\;%E_??';;5' E"¥a.,E2i_g'E@E@ G?' §{{}?'~ErS§5R T@"i?'xf§\§ PGLEQE S'§1%T§'{§§§§ »{5C.,€T;?§'€0.2§8§2§i E} P$§\EB§}."=EG ETEEE FEE G?' Sm; J~~?§EL2ii'Z%E ANS JEVEFQ {Saga zgigfisgzfl mg mg '*-."--g<> E5F§::x:cE;$ PVEEESZSIEABELE 'mggg SEf§:'?EG"i*~§$ 3:22, 23: gm v.§f:i'3;;§":a%;;w SE{i?'§fiN 3:; 6:23' {F5 '% "j v%:?:s_:_%5l; C333? mag mg %'{>Lw:2§?§»3a';: ?ET§'E§OE\.T €{}E'v'§E?€S ESQ; @§§ERS GE '§f'§§S BA? M 8 RD ER Afte: arguing the mafia? fer" same @3313? §§3::*::€d coungef. fer the petitions: sought dismissai of ih.$'*§§f'eiit'§_@:§ asg flat presssd. 'B16 submissien is pi:/med an _:"'é--c0:"§'.vv.§"' 'V * {:1 the light 9f the above S1li:gH'1i§éiQ:§1'%'-IV' dismissed as :20: pressed, m~.;,' I " 'V KGR*