Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Vichitra vs The Secretary To The Government on 28 February, 2020

Author: R.Subbiah

Bench: R.Subbiah, R.Pongiappan

                                                                               H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 28.02.2020

                                                      CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
                                              and
                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

                                               H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019
                      S.Vichitra
                      W/o.Suresh                                               ... Petitioner
                                                         Vs

                      1.The Secretary to the Government,
                        Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
                        Secretariat, Chennai – 600009.

                      2.The District Collector & District Magistrate,
                        Vellore District,
                        Vellore – 9.                                           ... Respondents

                            Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records in
                      connection with the order of detention passed by second respondent
                      dated 15.07.2019 in Memo No.C3/D.O.No.77/2019 against the
                      petitioner's friend Manikandan @ Kovil Mani, Male, aged 35 years,
                      S/o.Subramani, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside
                      the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this
                      Court and set him at liberty.


                      1/6
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                              H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019



                                   For Petitioner    :      Mr.D.Balaji
                                   For Respondents :        Mr.R.Prathap Kumar
                                                            Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                         *****

                                                    ORDER

[Order of this Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] Petitioner is the friend of the detenu viz., Manikandan @ Kovil Mani, aged about 35 years, S/o.Subramani Nadar, who has been branded as a ‘Goonda’ under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under order of second respondent passed in Memo No.C3/D.O.No.77/2019 dated 15.07.2019.

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:

Sl. Name of the Police Station and Section of Law No. Crime No.
1. Srirangam Police Station, 379 IPC Crime No.751/2018
2. Tanjavur Town East Police Station, 379 IPC Crime No.63/2019
3. Kaveripakkam Police Station, 379 IPC Crime No.308/2019 The alleged ground case has been registered against the detenu in Crime 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019 No.344 of 2019 on the file of Kaveripakkam Police Station for offences u/s.294(b), 392, 394, 307 and 506(ii) IPC. Aggrieved by the order of detention, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents. Perused the materials on record.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the booklet furnished to the detenu, the Tamil version of ‘Remand Extension Order’ was not available. Learned counsel informs that the same adversely has affected his right of making an effective representation.

5. We have heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the above submissions.

6. Non-furnishing of Tamil version of 'Remand Extension Order' 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019 would deprive the detenu the opportunity of making effective representation to the authorities concerned. The same, which amounts to an infringement of right enshrined under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India, would vitiate the order of detention. For the aforesaid reason, this Court would allow the present petition.

Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the detention order passed by the second respondent against the detenu viz., Manikandan @ Kovil Mani, aged about 35 years, S/o.Subramani Nadar, in Memo No.C3/D.O.No.77/2019 dated 15.07.2019, is set aside. The above named detenu is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his custody is required in connection with any other case.

                                                               [R.P.S., J]         [R.P.A., J]
                                                                         28.02.2020
                      Index:yes/no
                      Internet:yes
                      gm




                      4/6
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                        H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019




                      To

1.The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600009.

2.The District Collector & District Magistrate, Vellore District, Vellore – 9.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

R.SUBBIAH, J and 5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019 R.PONGIAPPAN, J gm H.C.P.No.2537 of 2019 28.02.2020 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in