Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Union Of India vs Alcobex Metals Ltd. on 15 October, 2015

Bench: A.K. Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman

                                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4924 OF 2007


                  UNION OF INDIA                                               ... Appellant

                                                       VERSUS

                  ALCOBEX METALS LTD. & ANR.                                   ... Respondents


                                                   O R D E R

By the impugned judgment, the High Court of Rajasthan has dismissed the appeal of the appellant herein, thereby confirming the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'CESTAT') holding that the 'industrial dust' arising during the course of manufacturing of brass and copper articles in the factory of the respondent is not marketable and therefore, would not attract excise duty. While coming to this conclusion, the High Court has specifically followed two judgments of this Court viz., 'Union of India and others v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. and Another' [1995 Supp. (2) SCC 465] and 'Collector of Central Excise, Patna v. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.' [2004 (9) SCC 1].

After going through the records, we find that the 'industrial dust' in the present case is almost identically placed as the products, viz., dross and skimmings which were Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date: 2015.10.16 17:23:21 IST Reason: involved in the Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd.'s case (supra).

We, thus, find that the High Court was correct in its C.A. No. 4924 OF 2007 1 approach in relying upon the aforesaid two judgments and arriving at the conclusion as mentioned above.

This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

........................, J.

[ A.K. SIKRI ] ........................, J.

[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi;

October 15, 2015.





C.A. No. 4924 OF 2007                                             2
ITEM NO.103                     COURT NO.14                 SECTION III

                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No. 4924/2007

UNION OF INDIA                                             Appellant(s)

                                      VERSUS

ALCOBEX METALS LTD. & ANR.                                 Respondent(s)

(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing rejoinder affidavit, interim relief and office report) Date : 15/10/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Adv. Ms. Aruna Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Naik H. K., Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv.
Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. V. Sridharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, Adv. Mr. Anandh K., Adv.
Mr. Hemant Bajaj, Adv. Ms. L. Charanaya, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. In view thereof, applications, if any, pending are disposed of.
       (Nidhi Ahuja)                               (Renu Diwan)
       COURT MASTER                                COURT MASTER

[Signed order is placed on the file.] C.A. No. 4924 OF 2007 3