Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Alma Khatun vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 5 January, 2026

05.01.2026
Sl. No.17
 Ct. No.14
  ss
                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                       CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
                                APPELLATE SIDE

                              W.P.A. No. 13981 of 2025

                                   Alma Khatun
                                       Versus
                          The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                 Ms. Priyanka Chandra
                                                     ...for the Petitioner.

                 Mr. Md. Masood
                                                     ...for the State.


        1.   Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is

             taken on record.

        2.   By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks for

             disbursement of interest on arrear pension from 13th

             April, 2010 to 28th April, 2025.

        3.   The petitioner contends that her father was an approved

             Assistant Teacher of Bhabanipur Mgd. Primary School,

             P.O. Bhada, District Malda. The father of the petitioner

             retired   from   service   on   superannuation      on     28th

             February, 1999 and expired on 19th March, 2002 leaving

             behind the present petitioner as his nominee for family

             pension. The petitioner is the unmarried daughter of the

             deceased    employee. The       petitioner   recieved    family

             pension till 13th February, 2004, however, that was

             stopped thereafter. On the basis of Government Order

             dated 13th April, 2010, the Pension Payment Order was

             issued on 28th April, 2025 in favour of the petitioner and
                              2




     family pension was restarted. The arrear of pension has

     been disbursed in favour of the petitioner for the period

     of 13th April, 2010 till 28th April, 2025. However, no

     interest on the delayed payment has been granted.

     Hence, this writ petition.

4.   Ms.    Priyanka     Chandra,     learned    Advocate      for   the

     petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to

     interest on the arrear amount since there is delay in

     disbursement of the same.

5.   Md. Masood, learned advocate for the State leaves the

     matter to the discretion of the Court.

6.   The contention in writ petition shows that family

     pension was granted to the petitioner till 13th February,

     2004. However, the same was stopped. The family

     pension was granted in favour of the petitioner on 28th

     April, 2025 in terms of Government Order dated 13th

     April, 2010 and arrear of pension has been disbursed

     from 13th April, 2010 till 28th April, 2025. As such, there

     is delay in disbursement of the same. Hence, the

     petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed payment of

     arrears.

7.   In    view   of   the   above,   since     there   is   delay    in

     disbursement of the amount, the respondent no.2,

Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance as well as respondent no.4, the Treasury Officer, Malda-I is directed to disburse interest on arrear pension in favour of the petitioner @ 8% per annum from 13th April, 2010 till 28th April, 2025, within a 3 period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

8. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the respondent no.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and respondent no.4, the Treasury Officer, Malda-I, for necessary compliance.

9. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted.

10. With the above direction, the writ petition being WPA 13981 of 2025 stands disposed of.

11. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

12. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of.

13. There shall be no order as to costs.

14. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

15. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)