Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Shri Parasnath Asharfilal Gupta vs Dr.Sandip Jaste on 11 February, 2015

  
 
 
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
  
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

BEFORE THE
    HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
    
   
    
     
     

COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

Complaint
      Case No. CC/03/59
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

Shri Parasnath Asharfilal Gupta,
         

R/at : Bakat Ali Nagar, 
         

G-4, Room No.9,
         

Antop Hill, Wadala East,
         

Mumbai 400 037.
         

[Through Constituted Attoreny
         

Shri Chhangur S. Chauhan] 
        
       
      
       

 
      
       
       

...........Complainant(s)
      
     
      
       
       

  
      
       
       

  
      
     
      
       
       

Versus
      
       
       

  
      
     
      
       
       
         
         
         

1.

Dr.Sandip Jaste, Having his Clinic situated at Opp.Bharat Chambers, Next Gomantak Hotel, Near Plaza Cinema, N.C.Kelkar Road, Dadar, Mumbai 400 028.

............Opp.Party(s)   BEFORE:

   
HON'BLE MR. Shashikant A. Kulkarni PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR. Narendra Kawde MEMBER   For the Complainant:
None   For the Opp. Party:
Adv.N.D.Jaywant for the opponent no.1.
 
ORDER Per Honble Mr.Narendra Kawade, Member None is present for the complainant. Adv.N.D.Jaywant is present for the opponent no.1. None is present for the opponent no.2.
On last time, complaint was adjourned for the appearance of the complainant in the interest of justice since notice sent by RPAD returned undelivered with postal endorsement not found. It appears that the complainant is not interested in prosecution of the complaint. Hence, complaint stands dismissed in default. No order as to costs.
Pronounced Dated 11th February, 2015.
 
[HON'BLE MR.
Shashikant A. Kulkarni] PRESIDING MEMBER       [HON'BLE MR.
Narendra Kawde] MEMBER PGG