Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Decided On : 07.01.2025 vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh And ... on 7 January, 2025

Author: Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel

                                                                                            2025:HHC:1298


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
                          SHIMLA
                                                                             CWP No. 12887 of 2024
                                                                             Decided on : 07.01.2025
Upinder Singh
                                                                                             ...Petitioner
                                                          Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh and another.
                                                                                        ...Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner   :    Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the respondents :                                     Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy
                                                          Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-

"(i) That the order dated 23- 10-2024 (Annexure-P/4) passed by the respondent No. 2, being vague, unwarranted, invalid, void abinitio, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjustified, unconstitutional, invalid, discriminatory, contrary, violative of principles of natural justice and nullity in the eyes of law, may kindly be quashed and set aside.

1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2

2025:HHC:1298

(ii) That the inaction on the part of the respondent No. 1 in not considering and deciding the representation/appeal dated 24-10- 2024 (Annexure-P/5) of the petitioner may kindly be held illegal, unjust, unreasonable, unconditional and unsustainable in the eyes of law."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served in case, the Authority concerned is called upon to decide the representation (Annexure P-5), filed by the petitioner.

3. In view of the innocuous prayer so made by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-5) be decided by the Authority concerned, within a period of four weeks from today. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case and the respondent-Authority may decide the representation in accordance with law and rules. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 07, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)