Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Mukesh Kumar And 7 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 May, 2026

Author: Saurabh Srivastava

Bench: Saurabh Srivastava





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC:114101
 

 
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
 
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 17956 of 2026   
 
   Mukesh Kumar And 7 Others    
 
  .....Applicant(s)   
 
 Versus  
 
   State of U.P. and Another    
 
  .....Opposite Party(s)       
 
   
 
  
 
Counsel for Applicant(s)   
 
:   
 
Avinash Mani Tripathi, Prashant Kumar Singh   
 
  
 
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)   
 
:   
 
G.A.   
 
     
 
 Court No. - 77
 
   
 
 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.        

1. Heard learned counsel for parties.

2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge sheet dated 23.12.2024 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 6.1.2026 and entire proceeding of Case No. 26 of 2026 (State Vs. Mukesh Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 552 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 115(2) BNS, P.S. Jalesar, District Etah.

3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet, can be set aside.

4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.

6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail and if there is no other legal impediment before court concerned, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).

7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.) May 15, 2026 Shaswat