Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ramit Basu vs Union Of India on 26 October, 2021

Author: Chief Justice

Bench: Chief Justice

                                                                                      1                                  WP-9742-2021
                                                          The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                                     WP-9742-2021
                                                                  (RAMIT BASU AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS)

                                                                                    WP/12124/2021
                                              4
                                              Jabalpur, Dated : 26-10-2021
                                                         Shri Anshuman Singh and Shri Surendra Verma, learned counsel for
                                              the petitioners.
                                                         Shri Ashish Anand Bernard, learned Deputy Advocate General for the
                                              respondents/State.

Shri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-Union of India. Shri Rohan Harne, learned counsel for the intervenor. Shri Akshay Sapre, learned counsel for the respondent No.7. Shri Chandra Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel for the respective respondents.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is brought to our notice that the area for which a letter of intent has been issued by the State comes within the Buxwaha Sub-division of Chhatarpur Forest Division. It is submitted that it is the corridor between the Panna Tiger Reserve and the Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary. It is further pleaded that there are ancient structures such as rock paintings etc. on the land in question. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to direct the respondent No.7 not to commence any mining activities or any other construction activities without the explicit permission of this Court.

Issue rule nisi.

Post this matter for final hearing in usual course.

                                                        (RAVI MALIMATH)                                (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
                                                          CHIEF JUSTICE                                           JUDGE

                                              Priya.P




Signature Not Verified
  SAN




Digitally signed by priyanka pithawe mishra
Date: 2021.10.28 13:50:48 IST