Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

K.N. Vijaya Kumar vs State Of Kerala

Bench: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai

       

  

  

 
 
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
                                      &
              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI

         WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/16TH KARTHIKA 1934

                        WP(C). No. 24690 of 2012 (I)
                         ---------------------------

PETITIONERS:
-----------

     1.  K.N. VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS
         AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN NAIR
         KIZHAKKEDATH HOUSE, MANJUMALAKARA
         VANDIPERIYAR P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.

     2.  JOSEPH V.M., AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. MATHEW,
         VAYALUNKAL HOUSE, LAKSHMI KOVIL P.O.,
         PEERMADE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

         BY ADVS. SRI. S. RAJEEV
                  SRI. K.K. DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN

RESPONDENTS:
-----------

     1.  STATE OF KERALA
         REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. SECRETARIAT
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

     2.  THE CHAIRMAN, THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
         NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

     3.  COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDANCODE
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

         R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. RAMPRASAD UNNI
         R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI. KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION  ON
       07-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C). No. 24690 of 2012 (I)


                                 APPENDIX


PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:-


EXT. P1    -     COPY OF THE NOTICE ENUMERATING THE GENERAL AND SPECIAL
                 CONDITIONS OF TENDER.


EXT. P2    -     COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS
                 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 05.10.010.


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:-  NIL


                                                          //TRUE COPY//




                                                          P.A. TO JUDGE.


sp



             THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
                                    &
               A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JJ.
                    -----------------------------------
                   W.P(C).No.24690 of 2012
                    ------------------------------------
            Dated this the 7th day of November, 2012

                            JUDGMENT

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

The petitioners claim that they are authorised lottery selling agents. They challenge Ext.P1 conditions for auction issued by the Travancore Devaswom Board to the extent it prohibits sale of lottery tickets in Sabarimala, Pampa and Nilakkal. Hearing the matter for admission on 19.10.2012, we were told on behalf of the TDB that ban on sale of lottery tickets was in force during the previous years. We, however, suggested the TDB and the Government to consider whether there could be a stall directly under the control of the Government from where lottery tickets could be sold in Pampa.

Considering the suggestion, the Chief Commissioner of TDB has opined that it would not be conducive to provide a stall of that nature having regard to the intention to minimize WPC.24690/12 2 commercial activities at Sabarimala. We have seen the views of the Chief Commissioner as presented before us by the leaned counsel for TDB. We accept the views of the Chief Commissioner. Hence we do not find any ground to interfere with the ban of sale of lottery tickets in Sabarimala, Pampa and Nilakkal. We also are of the view that even a sales counter, as suggested by this Court at the time of hearing for admission on 19.10.2012, also need not be there. The larger interest is to de-commercialise the activities in Sabarimala, Pampa, Nilakkal, Erumely etc. First priority will be to see that there is free movement and no crowding of the pilgrims in such places. In such circumstances, no further direction is to be issued. Writ petition closed accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/-

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI Judge kkb.7/11.