Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Maj. Deepak Yadav And Another vs Col. Rs Yadav And Another on 19 March, 2010

Author: Sabina

Bench: Sabina

Crl. Misc. No. M- 8404 of 2010                              1

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH

                                          Crl. Misc. No. M- 8404 of 2010
                                         Date of Decision: March 19, 2010


Maj. Deepak Yadav and another                               ........Petitioners

                              Versus

Col. RS Yadav and another                                 ........Respondents




CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present: Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate
         for the petitioners.


SABINA, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') for quashing complaint No.23 dated 25.11.2008 (Annexure P-1), order dated 08.02.2010 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Rewari in Criminal Revision No.1 dated 08.02.2010 pending for 19.03.2010 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

Respondent No.1 has filed the complaint against the petitioners and others under Sections 420,467,468,471 and 120-B IPC.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the respondent No.2 was habitual of lodging frivolous complaint. The other complaints filed by the complainant-respondent No.2 have been dismissed by the trial court.

The complaint in question was dismissed in default vide order dated 12.11.2009. Aggrieved by the same, respondent No.2 has filed the Crl. Misc. No. M- 8404 of 2010 2 revision petition. Vide impugned order dated 08.02.2010 notice has been issued to the petitioners and other respondents. The petitioners can appear before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari and submit their pleas available to them.

Keeping in view the above mentioned facts, no ground for interference is made out under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Dismissed.




                                                 (SABINA)
March 19, 2010                                    JUDGE
Anand