Karnataka High Court
Sri T Krishnamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 January, 2012
Author: H N Nagamohan Das
Bench: H N Nagamohan Das
EN ";"E~}E RISE COUR'? GP §<:ARNATAKA AT BANLE-,é%;:G'§'§.._ *' DATED THIS THE 1 E" DAY GE' JA£§E§_JAR':';'2'tj}'§.:52"v . ' 'BEFORE! THE H€)N'BLE MR. JUSTECE N;§G,r_:§&:0HiA,:€'-4::43*' "
WRIT PETITION N0.11013};2}fiV:(}L% S-RES) BETWEEN: '% Sri.TKR1SHNAMURTHY .
3,10. THIRUMALAIAH ' AGED ABOUT 28 YEg.»,Rs_V 'E"r'PIST',0FF1CE oF..T:~:E;;*;;"" . ' SPECIAL GFFECER5 KARNATAKA sf1;A?r5 3 - V '- CHOULTRY, i:*'H:Ru.MiALA:1; ANDHRA PRADESEE V' " ' RIAQUARTERS zmz. "
KARNATAKA. STVATE. "
CHARETEESL f:f:~:':RLa;:";iV../14../':;:,a'V--. _ ANQHRA E§j{{ABESI~§a ~ V ;?E'F§F§ONER {B135 39:1; Amt} ANB§';,_. " * fféfiu§TATS{§§:KARNAT;%KA L RE,P."BY"T{'%1E'PRENCEPg%i, 'v.SECRE*;*A:»I:Y m @9vER;N:=..«:ENT Véggzxgxya EE?AR7E"E:!iEN"§
- ;='%«j;"S._8'?3£iBENG ~ B;-'§s3\E{f:AL§RE ~ 523% 9% 3.
/,.§;.;"''"
x ,2' {W} M mg CQEX/i?»~fiESS§ONER FOR REUGIQUS AND CHARETABLE _ EiNDOWMENTS., €HAMARAJAP.E*F..,V BANGALQRE.
3; THE SPECIAL QFFICER.
KARNATAKA STATE " _ CHOULTRY,THIRU§\/IALA V ANDHRA PRADESH. - R.ES?FONDENTS {B}; Sri, RAGH;zxVE:'\r§R';§s;L»i:: \i:}i?{A_"§"§1R.§; §.::C%f:1:*:§ THIS WRIT i>E:r;:'.T§g;>N""}s §§:5E',.:>t1;;:"N1§g_E:% ARTICLES 226 AND 227 01:»"m:%:A1::0N;§T1Tz._moN INDIA WITH A PRAYER TQVQUASHV.-vVi::;1'E,% CIRDER BATED 04.06.2003 --.. ANNEXURE ;<;'z_ss:;E:> B' A{\§,) §TC. THIS WR§T._VPE7f'v1'"ET1§)3$3".§.*f)1\/{INS ON FOR FENAL HEARING '§HIS THE CQURT FASSED THE FQ3i1Q"7I.m:3'¥ V " .....
V ' _ §REER ,.1;fi::;:'s --vvffi:.a_§)::%V§zi§3§;:..{§:€: §3eEiE%@n€:r hag gjsrayed {G3 2: Wm in {he 0%' agmaa:g;%%q;m am: eggs: ajassa §}iL{}6.2{}{}8 by
-fisggioéiiigzézt }€{}I V2 i§e'»;};%:2g mézzoz gsaaaiiy {sf withhoidérég gme zinmjzfi Vi_§:f<;::':§%.'2é_::%. foé"f~i%:e §'i§SCG§E§E3{:§ c<:rmnaéi§e<§ by the pezigéazzeiz : ;~*-§"""
',?;.«5.;
/3' 5/"
<a'a§2;§gpeg; 'I
2. {En 2€>,{}2.2{}{}7 {he §)€3E§E§i}§}€}' wzaie w<>:'§~:i:3g as ~ Kamaiiaiéa S3336: Chouiiry siiuazed at Tirumaia Hifis PE'E}.di3iSh. 022 {mi day {ha p<;:{é1:i<mé::' ITE§SE3€haVt3{;7i witbE_:A fé;$Si:f§_§£ti§E'{{T3V._ V' his Excefiency the G:;>vs:"nme.:3§ of Kargazzzka whc-A_w::s in cadr:
<1?' Lisuienana 0:: {he C(}1T}pE£?:ifi§ issuesi pariiianer was keg): unéar by <3r<i'ef*"d;é1vvied 08£Ii20G7,EYE:Enquhyffifficers§§fififi@§§%@§@%§#%fi§§gna{fikxe is as evidence is ;§3F(}'i1i§"':§f1:.'#',5V The:
petiiiésner be $vzzrfi«i£ggV'f20§ ta Fépéiai Eyf3€ eff Aattherity issued 2:
notice 21:16 pasacgefi penalty w§£hh~:>kfing G136 2113:'-guai insreinzsng '<:.i1£:':A{iE2:»{«§..$;e effect agzé 1:ra.nsf'€€r@<i the §:3--i?:'ii:i {:>':;--e,:rj .'gh€5.._"@§?§i'C§ 9? €emn';isé;§«:>:2s;' 2:1; Kgfizzr, Hens mgwm§amm%m%"
Hea1*{§v;§§g:;:men{s {>23 §T%C)iL%E {he sida: argé §}€1§iESi'id gm crime 4;» ii. in aha: :':nqu§§j;; g}m<:::3edé::g$ me 2:<>zng:2k1in2m_:~'w::,§~..::i;€: gxamineii The Enquiry Offiiéer submitted 3, fc_p()r:-A.a::.2%v£§f:'g: thaf'-:}1':: -.-,_ charge is net proved. Th: Discipiinary AVuzh;9ri:y 'h.;_:s net g%K?é:13n_y reasons in the émpugneé ordcr of penalty f»d:_<iisjag2'eéi'r:g¢ ggzizh this findings of the E;nqs.;iry Clfféccir. in ;;irc;j;1';21S'Ea§i§<3:é;'~{he Qrfler of psnalty wéihhoiding one zznmtal incraitiexffi in 'Eaw";' " ' 5, For the reas0::s"'s:::;e,.d aLw§)'w:;"§hé f__<§H<>\3,?ing; V ....
i. Whit p{::iti<:n is,§:>'3rt§'_yi ii. The inipuggzcd -:>r«:3~3r'ef penalty dated {)4~,O6.20®8 - ,,': ':¥:iI3E}§XL§'§'€i KV"Vi:v:::@f'2;:r as it reiaies wiihhoiding (me u "V*::_::':m a§ .VE':ze:f::-meg: wéétheai c::r:2::Ea%§a*e ea?/'f<:<:t is izesrizby "--.:fquasE"ué.é§--} V j iii. '§§1é.3:2r:i€.: :3? iransfer :12? §€%;§¥é{}§Eéi§' fraém '§§mmaEa :0 ' ' _§{<}Ear is remains; ggéésiurhed.
. iii. "Tim pe'/::€a{§ ef sgzspsgsécm ie be iieazsd 2:3 9:: éuiye Fm" {£3 sasgsaséga g>€§%<>d ii}: pa:%§%i<>n22' is 32>: ${§i{§€@ /gm' ,6" 5 r /"
§,,/2 ibr regs;:lz::* wzgges cxasspi already gaid. iha subxésteézcc ail » LRS/E Z0 % ZOE Z.