Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ms. Poonam Kaur vs Ministry Of Electronics And ... on 28 January, 2026

Author: Bharati Dangre

Bench: Bharati Dangre

          Digitally
          signed by

   2026:BHC-AS:5114-DB
          RUSHIKESH
RUSHIKESH VISHNU
VISHNU    PATIL
PATIL     Date:
          2026.02.02
          11:58:25
          +0530
                                                       1/1              23 WP.5424.2022.odt

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 5424 OF 2022
                       Poonam Kaur                               .. Petitioner
                            Versus
                        Ministry of Electronics & Information
                        Technology (MEITY) & Ors.               .. Respondents
                                                     ...
                       Mr. Asim Sarode (through V.C.) for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w Samita Thakur, for Respondent No. 1.
                       Mr. Kedar Dighe, Addl.G.P. a/w Ms V. R. Raje, AGP, for the
                       Respondent - State.
                       Mr. C. Keswani (through V. C.) i/by Economic Laws Practice,
                       for Respondent No. 3.
                                                     ...
                                         CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
                                                  MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 28th JANUARY, 2026 P.C:-

1. On being confronted with the reliefs in the Petition, as the Petitioner alleges publication of certain defamatory statements on various social media platforms at the instance of Respondent No. 2, and the Petition seek a restrain order against Respondent No. 2 as well as Respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5, when we indicated to Mr. Sarode, learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said reliefs cannot be granted in exercise of our writ jurisdiction and the remedy open to him is filing of a suit in which such restrain order can be sought and even compensation can be prayed for, Mr. Sarode seek withdrawal of the proceedings with liberty to avail such appropriate remedy as is available to the Petitioner in law. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Rushikesh ::: Uploaded on - 02/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 06/02/2026 21:34:57 :::