Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Prestige Estate Projects Ltd vs The State Of Maharashtra on 13 September, 2023

Author: G.S. Patel

Bench: G.S. Patel

                                                               919-922-923-OSWPL-17993-2023+.DOC




                                                                                                     Arun



                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                      WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 17993 OF 2023


                       Prestige Estate Projects Ltd                                        ...Petitioner
                             Versus
                       The State of Maharashtra                                         ...Respondent

                                                         WITH
                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 238 OF 2023

                       Sugee Nine Developers LLP                                           ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                       State of Maharashtra                                             ...Respondent

                                                         WITH
                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 240 OF 2023

                       Sugee Two Developers LLP                                            ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                       State of Maharashtra                                             ...Respondent
ARUN
RAMCHANDRA
SANKPAL
                                                         WITH
Digitally signed by
ARUN
RAMCHANDRA
SANKPAL
Date: 2023.09.14
09:43:33 +0530
                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 1122 OF 2023

                       Sugee Fifteen Developers LLP                                        ...Petitioner
                             Versus
                       State of Maharashtra Through The Principal                       ...Respondent
                       Secretary




                                                         Page 1 of 4
                                                     13th September 2023


                      ::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2023                         ::: Downloaded on - 15/09/2023 02:48:06 :::
                                            919-922-923-OSWPL-17993-2023+.DOC




 Dr Abhinav Chandrachud, with Sanjay Kadam, Sanjeel Kadam &
      Nitisha Lad, i/b Kadam & Co, for the Petitioner in
      WP/240/2023.
 Mr Sanjay Kadam, with Sanjeel Kadam & Nitisha Lad, i/b Kadam &
      Co, for the Petitioner in WP/238/2023 & WP/1122/2023.
 Dr Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate with Mr Tushad Cooper,
      Senior Advocate, with Yash Momaya, Parag Kabadi & Falguni
      Thakkar, i/b DSK Legal, for the Petitioners.
 Mr Abhay L Patki, Addl GP with Uma Palsuledesai, AGP, for
      State in WPL/17993/2023.
 Mr Abhay L Patki, Addl GP, for State in WP/238/2023.
 Mr MA Sayed, AGP, for State in WP/240/2023.
 Mr Milind More, Addl GP, for State in WP/1122/2023.
 Mr Aspi Chinoy, Senior Advocate, with Joel Carlos, Vandana
      Mahadik, i/b Sunil K Sonawane, for Respondent-MCGM in
      WPL/17993/2023.
 Mr Joel Carlos, with Kunal Waghmare, i/b Sunil K Sonawane, for
      Respondent-MCGM in WP/238/2023 & WP/240/2023.
 Ms Vandana Mahadik, with Kunal Waghmare, i/b Sunil K
      Sonawane, for Respondent-MCGM in WP/1122/2023.


                               CORAM     G.S. Patel &
                                         Kamal Khata, JJ.
                               DATED:    13th September 2023
 PC:-


1. All these matters have apparently a common question of law that seems to arise from a State Government Resolution dated 14th January 2021 granting a rebate of 50% on the premium payable for the purchase of additional FSI.

2. In Writ Petition (L) No. 17993 of 2023 pleadings are complete. However, in Writ Petition No. 240 of 2023, there is an Page 2 of 4 13th September 2023 ::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 15/09/2023 02:48:06 ::: 919-922-923-OSWPL-17993-2023+.DOC Affidavit in Reply only to the unamended Petition. That Writ Petition and Writ Petition No. 238 of 2023 have been amended. There is no Affidavit in Reply to Writ Petition No. 238 of 2023. There is no amendment proposed in Writ Petition No. 1122 of 2023. However, there is still no Affidavit in Reply.

3. Hence the following directions.

4. A further Affidavit in Reply in Writ Petition No. 240 of 2023 to the amended Petition is to be filed and served on or before 5th October 2023. Affidavits in Reply to the amended Writ Petition No. 238 of 2023 and to Writ Petition No. 1122 of 2023 are also to be filed and served by 5th October 2023.

5. Affidavits in Rejoinder are to be filed and served on or before 9th October 2023.

6. All Petitions will be taken up together on 11th October 2023 at 2.30 pm.

7. Counsel are requested to make available a list of dates and, if possible, the factual differences in each matter. A concise note of written submissions is also requested. It is to be filed in advance in hard and soft copy. Soft copies of compilations of authorities properly indexed, paginated and bookmarked are also required in advance.

Page 3 of 4

13th September 2023 ::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 15/09/2023 02:48:06 ::: 919-922-923-OSWPL-17993-2023+.DOC

8. In Writ Petition (L) No. 17993 of 2023 Affidavit in Rejoinder is to be filed in the Registry.

 (Kamal Khata, J)                                              (G. S. Patel, J)




                                   Page 4 of 4
                               13th September 2023


::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2023                         ::: Downloaded on - 15/09/2023 02:48:06 :::