Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Dr. Ananya Banerjee vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 22 November, 2018

Author: Arindam Sinha

Bench: Arindam Sinha

                                                1


22.11.2018
   [04]
 Suman
 Ct. 04


                             WP 4637(W) of 2018



                                      Dr. Ananya Banerjee

                                              Vs.
                                  The State of West Bengal & Ors.



                           Mr.    Kalyan Sarkar
                           Mr.    Falguni Bandyopadhyay
                           Mr.    B.R. Sidharth
                           Mr.    Kishalaya Ghosh
                                              ...for the petitioner

                           Mr. Arunangshu Chakraborty
                           Mr. Jyoti Prakash Khan
                           Mr. Sourya Bandyopadhyay
                               ...for Rabindra Bharati University



                   This writ petition has been listed under heading 'To Be

             Mentioned' at instance of petitioner citing urgency. Affidavit of

             service is filed.

                   Mr. Sarkar, learned advocate appearing on behalf of

             petitioner submits, his client served as Assistant Professor in

             subject     Philosophy    at   Rabindra         Bharati   University.   Then,

             obtaining    lien,    petitioner       served   at   Vidyasagar   University.

             Ultimately, she was released from her service at the former
                             2


university. In this writ petition she has ventilated grievance of

omission of Rabindra Bharati University to grant pension and

pensionary benefits. To that effect she had made representations

dated 3rd July, 2017 and 10th July, 2017, both of which she seeks

directions for consideration. He submits further, petitioner is

entitled to interest on benefits till now denied to her.

      Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appears on behalf of

Rabindra Bharati University and submits, his client, on direction

made, will consider the representations. He submits further, his

instructions are petitioner is not entitled to pensionary benefits.

      Respondent no.3 will consider said representations of

petitioner and if petitioner is found entitled to some benefit, also his claim for interest. Petitioner might be given an opportunity of being heard to place her claims before said respondent. The claims should be dealt with as informed to her within a period of four weeks from date of communication of this order.

Writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha, J.)