Madhya Pradesh High Court
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Ramesh Chandra Panwar on 1 April, 2022
Author: Vivek Agarwal
Bench: Vivek Agarwal
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 1st OF APRIL, 2022
REVIEW PETITION No. 144 of 2019
Between:-
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION
DEPT. VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. COMMISSIONER RAJYA SHIKSHA KENDRA
PUSTAK BHAWAN B WING ARERA HILLS
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. COLLECTOR SEHORE DISTT. SEHORE (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. COLLECTOR CHHATARPUR DISTT. CHHATARPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
5. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SCHOOL
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISTT. SEHROE
(MADHYA PRADESH)
6. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SCHOOL
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DIST. CHHATARPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
7. DISTRICT PROJECT COORDINATOR
CHHATAR PUR DIST. CHHATARPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
8. DISTRICT PROJECT COORDINATOR BALAGHAT
DISTT. BALAGHAT M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PANCHAYAT
DISTT. BALAGHAT M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PANCHAYAT
DISTT. CHHINDWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
11. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PANCHAYAT
DISTT. CHHATARPUR M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI AMIT MISHRA, PANEL LAWYER)
AND
1. RAMESH CHANDRA PANWAR S/O SHRI
RAMOVATAR PANWAR , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK R/O.
Signature Not
SAN
Verified DWARIKAPURI COLONY INFRONT OF SHAGUN
GARDEN BHOPAL ROAD NASRULLAGANJ
Digitally signed by (MADHYA PRADESH)
VAIBHAV
YEOLEKAR
Date: 2022.04.05
18:17:21 IST
2
2. SURAJ SINGH S/O KALURAM , AGED ABOUT 48
YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMNAGAR TAH
ICCHAWAR DISTRICT SEHORE MP (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. PARASRAM NAGAR S/O SHRI KHUSHILAL NAGAR
, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
BISEN KHEDI TEH ICCHAWAR DISTRICT SEHORE
M P (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SHYAMLAL NAPIT S/O SHRI JAGANNATH NAPIT ,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARWA POST
B A N D H N I TAH RAJNAGAR DISTRICT
CHHATARPUR MP (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. PREMNARAYAN AHIRWAR S/O SHRI JAVRA
AHIRWAR , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
RAMTORIYA BLOCK BADA MALAHARA DISTRICT
CHHATARPUR MP (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. AHMENDRA KUMAR JAIN S/O SHRI
PANCHAMLAL JAIN , AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE AND POST RAMTORIYA BLOCK BADA
MALHARA DISRTRICT CHHATARPUR MP
(MADHYA PRADESH)
7. SHANKER LAL MISHRA S/O SHRI NANRAM
MISHRA , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
EX ANUDESHAK RESIDENTO F VILLAGE AND
POST PAHRAPURWA BLOCK RAJNAGAR DISTRICT
CHHATARPUR M P (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. GANESH PRASAD SHARMA S/O SHRI GAYA
PRASAD SHARMA , AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF
BLOCK RAJNAGAR DISTRICT CHHATARPUR MP
(MADHYA PRADESH)
9. RAMESH PRASAD KUSHWAHA S/O SHRI RAMLAL
KUSHWAHA , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF
BAGRAN PURWA RAJNAGAR DSTRICT
CHHATARPUR MP (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. SURESH KUMAR PANWAR S/O SHRI GOPAL SINGH
, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF CHAIPURA DISTT
SEHORE MP S (MADHYA PRADESH)
11. RAMURTY TIWARI S/O SHRI RAJRARAM TIWARI ,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF ALOUNA BLOCK
RAJNAGAR DISTRICT CHHATARPUR MP
(MADHYA PRADESH)
12. SHYAMLAL DUBEY S/O SHRI SARJU PRASAD
DUBEY , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE VISHWA POST SHMAARIYA BLOCK
BADA MALHARA DISTRICT CHHATARPUR MP
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3
13. RAVISHANKER GUPTA S/O SHRI BABULAL GUPTA
, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
BADA MALAHARA DISTRICT CHHATARPUR MP
(MADHYA PRADESH)
14. NANDLAL PAL S/O GULIYA PAL , AGED ABOUT 50
Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: E ANUDESHAK
BACHHARAPURWA BLOCK RAJNAGAR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
15. KALYAN SINGH S/O LATE SHRI KHUMAN SINGH ,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCCUPATION: E
ANUDESHAK VILLAGE AND POST SANCHER TAH.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
16. PATIRAM LODHI S/O HALKE RAM LODHI , AGED
ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK
VILLAGE DANDERA POST SANCHET TAH. AND
DISTT. (MADHYA PRADESH)
17. RAMESHWAR PRASAD VISHWAKARMA S/O SHRI
CHIRONJILAL , AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE AND
POST HIRANKHEDA TAH. RAHATGARH (MADHYA
PRADESH)
18. RAJENDRA PRASAD RAI S/O SHRI DWARIKA
PRASAD , AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
EX ANUDESHAK VILALGE PIPARIYA GHAT POST
HIRANKHEDA TAH. RAGHAVGARH (MADHYA
PRADESH)
19. JAGDISH DUBEY S/O SHRI PRABHU LAL DUBEY ,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK INDRA COLONY MANDIR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
20. BADRI PRASAD VERMA S/O SHRI AMAR SINGH
VERMA , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE MUHALI POST
MUNGAWALI (MADHYA PRADESH)
21. BABULAL MEWADA S/O SHRI BHAIRAV SINGH ,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK VILLAGE KACHNARIYA POST
CHUPADIYA (MADHYA PRADESH)
22. KAILASH NARAYAN ARYA S/O SHRI UMRAO
SINGH ARYA , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK KHEDA BAIJNATH
(MADHYA PRADESH)
23. BADAM SINGH S/O SHRI RAM SINGH , AGED
ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK
VILLAGE GUNDI POST AHMEDPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
24. RAM SANJIWAN NAMDEO S/O SHRI DAULAT RAM
NAMDEO , AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE SHATI NAGAR
CHANSOUR TAH. AND DISTT. BLOCK GHANSOUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4
25. SONILAL DAHERIYA S/O SHRI PREMLAL
DAHERIYA , AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE DEWARI
POST DEWARI TAH. AND BLOCK GHANSOUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
26. RAMNATH YADAV S/O SHRI LAKKHU YADAV ,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: EX
ANUDESHAK VILLAGE MEHARTALA POST
DEWARI TAH. AND BLOCK GHANSOUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
27. JAGAN SINGH NAGESH S/O SHRI DALCHAND
NAGESH , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE BINOURI POST PAHADI
TAH. GHANSOUR BLOCK GHANSOUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
28. SUBHASH CHAND NAGESH S/O MANGAL PRASAD
NAGESH , AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE BINOURI POST PAHADI
TAH. GHANSOUR BLOCK GHANSOUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
29. SATISH PARASHAR S/O SHRI RADHESHYAM
PARASHAR , AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: EX ANUDESHAK VILLAGE AND
POST NASRULLAGANJ SUBHASH COLONY WARD
NO. 1 INDORE ROAD NEAR ARE MACHINE TAH.
NASRULLAGANJ (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS)
T h is petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners/State, I do not find any ground to review the impugned order dated 9/05/2018.
I am not pursuaded to take another view than the view taken by a co- ordinate Bench in view of the decision in the case of Manmohan Mathur and others Vs. State of M.P. decided in W.P. No. 1102/2010 against which writ appeal and S.L.P. were dismissed.
Accordingly, the review petition fails and is dismissed.
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE vy