Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Thakorbhai Gokulbhai Parmar & 3 vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 30 March, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, Z.K.Saiyed

                  C/SCA/4740/2016                                            ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4740 of 2016

         ==========================================================
                  THAKORBHAI GOKULBHAI PARMAR & 3....Petitioner(s)
                                     Versus
                       STATE OF GUJARAT & 3....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR MEHULSHARAD SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 - 4
         ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED

                                    Date : 30/03/2016


                                     ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) In   view   of   the   fact   that   the   award   under  Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in  the present case was passed on 4.10.2011, learned  counsel   for   the   petitioners   does   not   press   the  challenge   to   the   acquisition   on   the   basis   of  Section  24(2)  of the  Right  to Fair  Compensation  and   Transparency   in   Land   Acquisition,  Rehabilitation   &   Resettlement   Act,   2013.   He,  however,   submitted   that   the   land   of   the  petitioners falls within 300 meters of the gamtal  land. As stated before the Court by the counsel  for   the   GIDC   which   was   recorded   in   the   order  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Mar 31 01:17:31 IST 2016 C/SCA/4740/2016 ORDER dated   19.10.2010   in   Special   Civil   Application  No.9248 of 2010 and connected petitions, the GIDC  policy does not envisage generally acquiring such  lands. It was conveyed to Court then that a fresh  decision  therefore  be taken  whether  to go ahead  with the acquisition of the land or no. Counsel  for   the   petitioners   further   submitted   that  without conveying the decision of the GIDC to the  petitioners the award under Section 11 came to be  passed. Such award was passed without any notice  to the petitioners and even copy of the award was  never served on the petitioners. The petitioners  have   neither   received   compensation   nor   the  possession of the land was taken over. 

Notice returnable on 24.4.2016. 

Both   the   sides   will   maintain   status   with  respect to land in question. 

Direct service is permitted. 

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (Z.K.SAIYED, J.) KKS Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Mar 31 01:17:31 IST 2016