Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ajay Santosh Pandey vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 August, 2021

Author: Sandeep K. Shinde

Bench: Sandeep K. Shinde

Rane                         1/2              BA-2568-2021 (SR.25)
                                                    13August,2021


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2568/2021

Ajay Santosh Pandey                 .....Applicant
     V/s.
State of Maharashtra                ....Respondent


                 ****
Mr. Mandar M. Goswami, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for State.

               CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

(through Video Conference) Friday, 13th August, 2021.

P.C. :

1. Although the investigation is over, the chargesheet, prima-facie, shows that applicant has forged the valuable security for the purpose of cheating. The applicant was denied the pre-arrest bail by this Court and even by the Apex Court. He surrendered to the Court of original jurisdiction on 9th April, 2021. It is informed that the complainant, who was a partner of the applicant, has Rane 2/2 BA-2568-2021 (SR.25) 13August,2021 expired. Apparently the forged valuable security has caused wrongful gains to the applicant.
2. Mr. Goswami, learned Counsel for the applicant, would submit that the complainant has been compensated and made good the loss. Let this fact be verified by the Investigating Officer from the son of the deceased, (complainant).
3. Stand over to 9th September, 2021 for further consideration.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT Date:

SAWANT     2021.08.13
           19:35:06 +0530