Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.Ramanathan vs The State Transport Authority on 21 December, 2020

Author: P.D. Audikesavalu

Bench: P.D. Audikesavalu

                                                                              W.P. No. 19651 of 2016

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 21.12.2020

                                                          CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

                                                  W.P. No. 19651 of 2016
                                                           and
                                                 W.M.P. No. 17013 of 2016

                V.Ramanathan                                                        ... Petitioner

                                                            -vs-

                1. The State Transport Authority,
                   Chepauk,
                   Chennai – 600 005.

                2. The Motor Vehicles Inspector (NT),
                   Transport Department Check Post,
                   Poonamallee.

                3. The Regional Transport Officer,
                   Tiruchirappalli East.                                        ... Respondents

                Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to accept the
                Motor Vehicles Tax for Tamil Nadu, voluntarily tendered by the Petitioner in
                advance for 7 days or 30 days or 90 days use in Tamilnadu in accordance with
                Ninth Schedule of the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974, in
                respect of the Petitioner's vehicles.


                                    For Petitioner    :     Mr. K.Hariharan


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/5
                                                                               W.P. No. 19651 of 2016

                                   For Respondents :     Mrs. A.B.Reehana Begum,
                                                         Government Advocate

                                                     ORDER

(through video conference) Heard Mr. K.Hariharan, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. A.B.Reehana Bengum, Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. It is brought to notice that the Division Bench of this Court in Pondicherry Contract Carriage Owners' Association -vs- State of Tamil Nadu [(2016) 4 MLJ 237] has declared the expression 'per entry' appearing along with the rate of tax indicated in the second column of the Ninth Schedule to the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for short), as against clause (c) therein covering contract carriages of omni buses as ultra vires and unconstitutional. The relevant statutory provision, for the sake of immediate reference, is extracted below:-

                           “                     NINTH SCHEDULE
                                                (See sections 3 and 6)

Contract carriages in respect of which temporary licence is issued:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/5 W.P. No. 19651 of 2016 ....
(c) Omni bus including sleeper coach in respect of which permit is granted under sub-section (8) or (9) of section 88 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:-
Rs. 600.00 per If the temporary licence is for the
(i) seat or berth per period not exceeding 7 days;

entry.

If the temporary licence is for a period Rs. 1500.00 per

(ii) exceeding 7 days but not exceeding 30 seat of berth per days; entry.

If the temporary licence is for a Rs. 3500.00 per

(iii) period exceeding 30 days but not seat or berth per exceeding 90 days; entry.

The Petitioner, who owns omni buses bearing Registration Nos. PY 01 CL 3685 and PY 01 CL 3686 (hereinafter referred to as 'omni buses' for short) which are stated to be operated as contract carriages in the State of Tamil Nadu, has filed this Writ Petition for directing the Respondents to accept motor vehicle tax for the said omni buses voluntarily tendered by the Petitioner in advance for the period of a week or a month or a quarter depending on the validity of the permit.

3. It would necessarily follow as a natural consequence of the aforesaid authoritative pronouncement which holds the field that once the Petitioner has https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 3/5 W.P. No. 19651 of 2016 remitted the entire amount of tax due for the specified period and holds valid permit, the Respondents cannot require the Petitioner to pay further amount as tax for every entry of the said omni buses into the State of Tamil Nadu till the end of that period, and there shall be an order of restraint against the Respondents in that regard.

In the result, the Writ Petition is ordered on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

21.12.2020 3/6 vjt Index: Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 28.12.2020.

To

1. The State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

2. The Motor Vehicles Inspector (NT), Transport Department Check Post, Poonamallee.

3. The Regional Transport Officer, Tiruchirappalli East.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 4/5 W.P. No. 19651 of 2016 P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

vjt W.P. No. 19651 of 2016 21.12.2020 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 5/5