Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 10]

Chattisgarh High Court

Vijay Kumar Ram vs State Of Chhattisgarh 60 Wps/2109/2018 ... on 9 March, 2018

Author: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

                                                                                              NAFR


          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                 WPS No. 2101 of 2018

          Vijay Kumar Ram S/o Shri Ramjeet Ram Aged About 39 Years
          Presently Working As Teacher Panchayat At Government Middle
          Shcool Kaprol Block Manora District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District :
          Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

                                                                               ---- Petitioner

                                            Versus

     1.   State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of
          Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan
          Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur,
          Chhattisgarh

     2.   Commissioner Cum Director , Directorate Of Panchayat Naya
          Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

     3.   Chief Executive Officer , Zila Panchayat Jashpur District Jashpur
          Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

                                                                           ---- Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioner             :        Mr. CJK Rao, Advocate.

For State                  :        Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 09/03/2018

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs.

Sd/-

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit