Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Roofit Industries Limited vs The Commercial Tax Officer on 27 November, 2018

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

                                                               1

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED : 27.11.2018

                                                            CORAM

                                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

                                                    W.P.No.12709 of 2007
                                                             and
                                                    M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2007


                      M/s.Roofit Industries Limited,
                      Rep. by its Works Manager,
                      B-42, First Main Road,
                      SIPCOT Industrial Complex,
                      Gummidipoondi – 601 201.                                ...   Petitioner

                                                              Vs
                      The Commercial Tax Officer,
                      Ponneri Assessment Circle,
                      Ponneri – 601 204.                                      ...   Respondent

                      Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                      issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the
                      respondent in his proceedings, dated 16.02.2007 in respect of
                      TNGST/1700568/04-05 pertaining to the petitioner and quash the same as
                      arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondent to defer the claim till the
                      completion of the proceedings pending before the Board for Industrial and
                      Financial Reconstruction.

                                   For Petitioner              : Mr.R.Munuswamy
                                   For Respondent              : Mr.M.Hariharan
                                                                 Additional Government Pleader




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                             2

                                                                                   R.MAHADEVAN, J.

                                                                                              arb/ms
                                                          ORDER

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.

2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

27.11.2018 Index: Yes/ No arb/ms To The Commercial Tax Officer, Ponneri Assessment Circle, Ponneri – 601 204.

W.P.No.12709 of 2007

and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2007 http://www.judis.nic.in