Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Union Of India vs M/S Dolly Exim Private Ltd. on 18 December, 2019

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, K.M. Joseph

                                                  1

     ITEM NO.26                           COURT NO.12                 SECTION IX

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.31345-31348/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-02-2017
     in WP Nos.3414/2014, 3416/2014, 3417/2014 and 3412/2014 passed by
     the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)

     UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                            Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

     M/S DOLLY EXIM PRIVATE LTD. ETC.ETC.                             Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.[TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH DY NO. 32166/2018]

     WITH SLP(C) No. 27500-27501/2018

     Date : 18-12-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

     For Petitioner(s)             Ms.   Nisha Bagchi,Adv.
                                   Ms.   Seema Bengani,Adv.
                                   Mr.   Prem Prakash,Adv.
                                   Mr.   Anas Zaidi,Adv.
                                   For   Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR

     For Respondent(s)             Mr.   Jay Savla,Sr.Adv.
                                   Ms.   Renuka Sahu,Adv.
                                   Mr.   Jasdeep Singh Dhillon,Adv.
                                   Mr.   Rahul Gupta, AOR
                                   Mr.   Shubham Narula,Adv.


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

The preliminary objection is raised by the respondent on the issue that in terms of order passed by Signature Not Verified this Court on 18th September, 2017 (Annexure P-6 at page Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2019.12.19 16:37:51 IST Reason:

708) what was permitted for the petitioner to do was to file an appeal under Section 35L of the Central Excise 2 Act, 1944 but instead they filed once again an appeal before the High Court which naturally could not have been entertained and was rejected. On the other hand learned counsel for the petitioner states that what they had filed before the High Court was seeking leave to appeal before the Supreme Court though the order passed by the High Court treated it as if it was an appeal as it was numbered so by the Registry.

We will have to deliberate on the aforesaid issue or any other issue which may arise.

Rejoinder affidavit be filed within three weeks. List on a non-miscellaneous day in the month of March, 2020.




(ANITA MALHOTRA)                               (ANITA RANI AHUJA)
  COURT MASTER                                    COURT MASTER