Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Surinder Kumar vs Geeta Rani on 1 November, 2017

Bench: M.M.S.Bedi, Augustine George Masih

FAO-M-198-2013 (O&M)



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH


                                         FAO-M-198-2013 (O&M).
                                         Decided on: November 1, 2017.

Surinder Kumar
                                               .. Appellant/petitioner No.1

                              VERSUS
Geeta Rani

                                             .. Respondent/petitioner No.2

                   ***
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI
       HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

                           ***
PRESENT             Mr.S.S.Momi, Advocate,
                    for the appellant/petitioner No.1.

                    Mr.Ashok Kumar Khunger, Advocate,
                    for the respondent/petitioner No.2.

M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)

The joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, has been filed by the petitioners seeking dissolution of the marriage between them by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 10.5.1996, at per Hindu rites and customs at village Malekan, District Sirsa. From their wedlock, the parties have been blessed with two children namely Chahat and Anmol. Appellant-petitioner No.1 filed a petition for divorce which was dismissed on 12.4.2013. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his petition for divorce, appellant-petitioner No.1 filed appeal before this Court and during pendency of the appeal the matter was settled and the appeal was converted to petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act vide 1 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 04-11-2017 20:46:04 ::: FAO-M-198-2013 (O&M) order dated 27.4.2017.

Pursuant to settlement arrived at between the parties, statements of the parties at first motion were recorded on 27.4.2017. Statements on second motion of the parties have been recorded today. Respondent-petitioner No.2/wife has agreed to dissolve the marriage on mutual consent on receipt of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in lump sum towards the dowry articles and permanent alimony. Demand draft of Rs.1,00,000/- was handed over to the respondent-petitioner No.2/wife on 27.4.2017 and demand draft of Rs.1,00,000/- has been handed over to respondent- petitioner no.2/wife today in the Court. As per settlement, the children will remain with petitioner No.1/husband.

In view of the statements of the parties recorded at first motion as well as at second motion, we are satisfied that the marriage between the parties has broken beyond repairs. The joint petition for grant of divorce by mutual consent filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is allowed. The marriage between the parties is dissolved by a decree of divorce on mutual consent. There shall be no order as to costs. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.




                                                     (M.M.S. BEDI)
                                                        JUDGE



November 1, 2017.                 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH)
raj arora                                     JUDGE
          Whether speaking / reasoned     Yes / No
          Whether reportable              Yes / No



                                        2
                               2 of 2
            ::: Downloaded on - 04-11-2017 20:46:05 :::