Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Sureshkumar Kochar vs The Inspector Of Police on 13 February, 2020

Author: P.Rajamanickam

Bench: P.Rajamanickam

                                                                     Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED: 13.02.2020

                                                    CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

                                          Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020
                                                    and
                                          Crl.M.P.No. 1847 of 2020


                      Sureshkumar Kochar                                     ...Petitioner

                                                     -Vs-

                      1.The Inspector of Police,
                         J-9, Thoraipaakam Police Station,
                         Crime No.815/2006.

                      2. Dhanraj Kochar

                      3. Inderchand D.Kochar

                      4. Rameshkumar Kochar

                      5. Jitesh Kumar

                      6. Rajkumari

                      7. Anitha

                      8. Sarala                                          ... Respondents



                      Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 407 r/w 482
                      of Code of Criminal Procedure, to pass an order to transfer the
                      criminal appeal in Crl.Appeal No.82 of 2017 pending on the file of
                      the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpet to any
                      other near court.

http://www.judis.nic.in
                      1/6
                                                                      Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020

                                 For Petitioner    : Mr.R.Bakyaraj

                                 For RR1           : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
                                                     Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                    ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the accused No.3 under section 407 r/w 482 of Cr.p.c to withdraw the Criminal Appeal No.82 of 2017 from the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram at Chengalpet and transfer the same to any other Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.

3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he filed a petition under section 391 Crpc, before the appellate court seeking permission to adduce additional documentary evidence and the said petition has been numbered as Crl.M.P.No.3658 of 2018, but, the learned Appellate Court Judge without disposing of the said petition, she proceeded to hear the arguments in the main Appeal. This Court is of the view that the Criminal Appeal need not be transferred on the ground that the learned Appellate Court Judge http://www.judis.nic.in 2/6 Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020 refused to dispose the petition filed under section 391 of Crpc separately.

4. Recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Asim @ Munmun @ Asif Abdulkarim Solanki Vs. The State of Gujarath ( Criminal Appeal No.184 of 2020, Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.8087 of 2019 dated 28.01.2020), has held as follows:

"Section 391 of the Cr.P.C does not impose any restriction as to when the application filed for adducing additional evidence should be heard by he High Court. In fact, we are of the opinion that it is desirable that an application filed under section 391 should be heard immediately after it is filed without waiting for the appeal to be finally heard."

5. In view of the aforesaid decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the petition filed under section 391 of Crpc shall be disposed of separately at the earliest without waiting for the appeal to be finally heard. Hence this Court feels that it is suffice to direct the learned Appellate Court Judge to dispose of the petition filed by the petitioner under section 391 of Crpc at the earliest. http://www.judis.nic.in 3/6 Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020

6. In the result, the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram at Chengalpet is directed to dispose of the petition filed by the petitioner under section 391 Crpc in Crl.M.P.No.3658 of 2018 separately at the earliest without waiting for the appeal to be finally heard. Further considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Principal District and Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram at Chengalpet is directed not to insist the personal appearance of the petitioner in all the hearings before the appellate court unless his personal appearance is absolutely necessary.

7. With the aforesaid directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                13.02.2020


                      Index    : Yes/No
                      Internet : Yes/No
                      mfa




http://www.judis.nic.in
                      4/6
                                                                    Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020



                      To


1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram at Chengalpet.

2.The Inspector of Police, J-9, Thoraipaakam Police Station.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5/6 Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020 P.RAJAMANICKAM, J.

mfa Crl.O.P.No.3141 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No. 1847 of 2020 13.02.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in 6/6