Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 12]

Bombay High Court

Chidambaram Chettiar vs Srinivasa Sastrial on 14 March, 1914

Equivalent citations: (1914)16BOMLR783

JUDGMENT
 

Moulton, J.
 

1. Their Lordships are of opinion that the two decisions appealed against are correct; that the High Court acted rightly in setting aside the two assignment?, the one to Annamalai and the other to Chidambaram, and that no valid proceedings can therefore be based on either of those assignments. The question whether any of the parties can establish rights based, not on the assignments, but on other grounds, such as the actual payment of debts, is a point which was in their Lordships' opinion, not before the Courts below, and is not before their Lordships, and on that point therefore they pronounce no opinion.

2. Their Lordships will, therefore, humbly advise His Majesty that these appeals should be dismissed.