Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

M.M.F. Rahaman, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 9 December, 2020

Author: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

Bench: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

[3163 ]

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH R

WRIT PETITION NO: 22501 OF 2020
Between:

 

M.M.F. Rahaman, S/o.Md. Sahab.

... Petitioner
AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,, Home Department,
Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. |

2. The Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Narsapuram, West Godavari

District.

The Inspector of Police, Circle Office, Narsapuram West Godavari District.

Mohammad Haseena, W/o Yakub Pasha, Aged 39 years, R/o. 13th Ward,

Narsapuram Town, West Godavari District.

Bo

... Respondents

Whereas the Petitioner above named through his Advocate Sri S Nanda
presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus
declaring that the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not initiating appropriate
action against 4th Respondent, her family members and henchmen in pursuance to
Petitioners various complaints dt. 10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein
and 25-11-2019, 19-08-2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein as
highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, malafide, irrational and to consequently direct
the Respondents No.2 and 3 herein to forthwith initiate appropriate action against
Respondent No.4, her family members and henchmen as required under law as per
Petitioners complaints dt. 10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein and 25-
11-2019, 19-08-2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein in the
interest of justice.

And Whereas the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein
and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Nanda Advocate for the Petitioner, directed
issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this WRIT
PETITION should not be admitted.

You viz:

Mohammad Haseena, W/o Yakub Pasha, R/o. 13th Ward, Narsapuram Town,
West Godavari District.

are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through
an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the
affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be
admitted, on or before 30-12-2020 on which date the case stands posted for
hearing.
 

The Court made the following:
ORDER:

"Learned Government Pleader for Home has taken notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and requests time to file counter. Issue notice to respondent No.4.

Post the matter after four (4) weeks." Sd/ - A. SURYA PRAKASH RAO iy Y REGISTRAR I'TRUE COPY!/ Vy ml | SECT ON FFICER, To

4. Mohammad Haseena, W/o Yakub Pasha, R/o. 13th Ward, Narsapuram Town, West Godavari District. (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds) One CC to Sri. S Nanda Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home (AP) ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] One spare copy wn PR HIGH COURT CMRJ DATED:09/12/2020 POST THE MATTER AFTER FOUR (4) WEEKS NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION WP.No.22501 of 2020