Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Afroz Istiyak Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 July, 2019

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

                                                                                 ABA 1474-19.doc



Anand            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

               ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1474 OF 2019

         Afroz Istiyak Khan                                                  .Applicant

                     Vs.

         The State of Maharashtra                                            .Respondent

         Ms Pranothi B. Pawar, Advocate, for the Applicant
         Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State
         Mr. Mhaske, PSI, Kandivali Police Station present

                           CORAM       :      REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

                           DATE        :      11.07.2019
         P.C.

         .                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.



         2.                By this Application, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in

         connection with C. R. No. 223 of 2019 registered with the Kandivali

         Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under

         Sections 323, 326, 504, 506(ii) r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.



         3.                Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that according to

         the Complainant, he is alleged to have been assaulted by the Applicant

         on his abdomen, with a cricket bat. A perusal of the Injury Certificates


                                                                                            1 of 3


        ::: Uploaded on - 12/07/2019                       ::: Downloaded on - 13/07/2019 03:13:25 :::
                                                                         ABA 1474-19.doc


 produced by the investigating officer shows that the Complainant -

 Rajendra Bahadur Patel has suffered no external injuries. As far as

 Vishal Patel is concerned, he has also not suffered any external injuries.

 As far as Manisha Mourya is concerned, she has sustained a CLW on

 her head allegedly with the stone, which is stated to be a simple injury.

 As far as Vikas Patel is concerned, he is also alleged to have sustained

 CLW on the left parietal region with a stone and the said injury also

 stated to be a simple injury. As far as the Applicant is concerned, he is

 alleged to have assaulted the Complainant with a cricket bat and not any

 other injured. Just because the Applicant has antecedents cannot be a

 ground to reject the Applicant's Application for Anticipatory Bail. In the

 facts, doubtful whether Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code will apply

 to the facts of the present case.



 4.                Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed and

 the Applicant is granted pre-arrest bail on the following terms &

 conditions :-

                                     ORDER

(i) In the event of arrest, the Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount;

2 of 3 ::: Uploaded on - 12/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 13/07/2019 03:13:25 ::: ABA 1474-19.doc

(ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station on 15th, 16th & 17th July, 2019 between 10.00 a. m. and 12.00 noon.

5. The Application is, accordingly, disposed of.

6. Stand over to 19.07.2019. To be listed on the Supplementary Board for recording compliance of attendance.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) 3 of 3 ::: Uploaded on - 12/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 13/07/2019 03:13:25 :::