Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Ruhulla vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2012

Author: Subhash B.Adi

Bench: Subhash B.Adi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13T™ DAY OF JANUARY 2012.
BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.J USTICE SUBHASH B ADI' a |

BETWEEN:

Ruhulla

S/o Late Rahamathulla

Aged about 32 years :

Residing at NO.12-1-505- 28- A."

C/o Mahaboobi

W/o Late Mohammed Fakruddir m

Extension Mohalla ee

Ramanagara Town." Pe .. PETITIONER

(By Sri.M.Parthasarathy, Ady.) ,
AND:

The State of Karnataka
Rep. By Ramanagara Towri Police. .. RESPONDENT

(By Sri.Raja Subramanya Bhat, HCGP)

'.. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

praying "to enlarge: the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.14/11. of

Ramanagara ~' Town P. S., Ramanagara, for the offences

piu, /s. 498(A), 323, 504 of IPC.

This petition coming on for orders this day. the Court

_tade the followi ng:


as

ORDER

Petitioner is accused No.1. He has been chargesheeted by Ramanagara Town Police, Ramanagara, id "Crime No.14/2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 498°, 323 and 504 0f IPC. | |

2. The deceased is the wife of the petitioners. She dice :

due to the burn injuries. No "doubt in the first dying declaration, she has only 'sta'ed, that there was altercation between herself and her husband - accused No.1] and she poured kerosene and sét herself ablaze However, in her second dying declaration, she has categorically stated that her husband poured keresene 'on her and set her on fire and this statement has been' recorded. in the presence of the Doctor.
When there is: direct eyidence against the petitioner, I find 'that, it is nota fit casé for grant of bail.
~ Accordingly, the petition fails and same is dismissed.
sma: