Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 15, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sajid Bhai Kabir Sayyad vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 June, 2020

Author: M. G. Sewlikar

Bench: M. G. Sewlikar

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

     22 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 387 OF 2020


     Sajid Bhai s/o Kabir Sayyad,
     Age : 50 years, Occu.: Agriculture & Business,
     R/o.: Dargapur Road, Ahmedpur,
     Tq. Ahmedpur, District : Latur            ...    APPLICANT

             VERSUS

     The State of Maharashtra through :
     Police Inspector, Police Station Ahmedpur,
     Tq. Ahmedpur, District : Latur             ...                 RESPONDENT

                                    ...
             Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Poonam Bodke Patil
                APP for Respondent-State : Mr. S. P. Tiwari
                                    ...

                                     CORAM : M. G. SEWLIKAR, J.
                                     DATE   : 22.06.2020


PER COURT :-



1.   This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of

anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0109 of 2020 under

Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 332, 333, 353, 504 read with 149

of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135 of the Maharashtra

Police Act registered with Ahmedpur Police Station, District Latur,



2.   Prosecution case in brief is that on 20.03.2020 the informant




      ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2020                 ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2020 03:45:52 :::
                                         2                                    ABA 387-20



Police Naik, Shivprasad Rangwal was on duty along with Police Head

Constable Bhise.            The informant and Police Head Constable Bhise

were directed to go to Char Tangi Lane at Ahmedpur, where a scufe

was going on. Therefore, he, PSI -Jadhav, Head Constable Bembde

and Head Constable Bhise along with others went to Char Tangi

Lane, Ahmedpur.            Free fghting was going on between two groups

one of Sayyad and the other of Maniyar. They were assaulting each

other with stones, cricket bats and sticks. Aplicant was also a

member of the said group. The informant and other police staf tried

to intervene and control the mob, but the applicant and others got

annoyed because of police intervention and instigated the members

of the mob to assault the police personnel.            Therefore, one Matin

Sayyad assaulted PSI Jadhav with cricket bat, Lala Sayyad assaulted

Head Constable Bembde by means of stone, Furdin Sayyad

assaulted Police Naik Devle by means of stick but the said Devle

intercepted the blow by his left hand.             Thus, members of the

unlawful assembly used criminal force against the police personnel

to deter them from discharging their duties. Hence, FIR was lodged.,

on the basis of which, the ofence under aforesaid sections was

registered.




     ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2020                ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2020 03:45:52 :::
                                       3                                    ABA 387-20



3.     Heard Ms. Poonam Bodke Patil, learned counsel for the

applicant and Shri S. P. Tiwari, learned APP for the State.                       She

submitted that the applicant has no role to play in the alleged

ofence. As per the FIR, he was simply present there. He did not

assault any of the police personnel.           Therefore, his custodial

interrogation is not necessary as nothing is to be recovered from

him.        She, therefore, prayed for releasing the applicant on

anticipatory bail.



4.     Shri      S. P. Tiwari, learned APP for the State argued that the
applicant instigated the mob to attack the police personnel. At his
instigation, the mob attacked the police personnel.                  One of the
members of the mob assaulted PSI - Jadhav.               Therefore, there is
prima facie evidence indicating the involvement of the applicant in
the ofence.



5.     On perusal of the FIR and other papers annexed with the

application, it is noticed that the applicant is simply shown to be

present at the spot of the incident. From the bare allegations of the

FIR, it is evident that no specifc role is attributed to the applicant.

There is nothing on record to show that the applicant had instigated




       ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2020            ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2020 03:45:52 :::
                                            4                                     ABA 387-20



the mob to attack the police personnel. In this view of the matter,

custodial interrogation of the applicant does not seem to be

necessary.            I am, therefore, inclined to release the applicant on

anticipatory bail. Hence, the order :

                                        ORDER

1. Application is allowed.

2. The applicant Sajid Bhai s/o Kabir Sayyad be released on bail on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.15,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount, in the event of arrest of the applicant in Crime No.0109 of 2020 under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 332, 333, 353, 504 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act registered with Ahmedpur Police Station, District Latur, on condition that he shall not interfere in the investigation and shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when called upon by the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station.

3. The application is accordingly disposed of.

(M. G. SEWLIKAR, J.) vsm/-

::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 24/06/2020 03:45:52 :::