Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M/S Kundlas Loh Udyog vs Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax on 19 February, 2018

Bench: A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan

     ITEM NO.7                             COURT NO.6                SECTION XIV

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 39405/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-05-2017
     in ITA No. 12/2016 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at
     Shimla)

     M/S KUNDLAS LOH UDYOG                                                Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

     PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX                                       Respondent(s)

     (With IA No.20564/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY                     IN    FILING   and   IA
     No.20565/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING)

     Date : 19-02-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

     For Petitioner(s)
                                     Dr.   Rakesh Gupta, Adv.
                                     Ms.   Monika Ghai, Adv.
                                     Mr.   Rohit Kumar Gupta, Adv.
                                     Mr.   Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

Delay condoned.

From the impugned order of the High Court, we find that the High Court has remitted the case to the Assessing Officer to examine and decide the matter afresh on the basis Signature Not Verifiedof the material adduced on record by the respective parties, Digitally signed by NIDHI AHUJA Date: 2018.02.20 17:11:25 IST Reason: so that it is confirmed that they had advanced loan to the assessee against interest through bank channel or not. 1 Diary No. 39405/2017 In view of this stand taken by the High Court, we are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition which is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, it is made clear that the Assessing Officer shall examine the issue afresh on the basis of material produced before it and in accordance with law, independently, notwithstanding the observations of the High Court in paragraph 2 of the order dated 17.5.2017 in ITA No. 12 of 2016.

           (NIDHI AHUJA)                   (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)
           COURT MASTER                        COURT MASTER




                                                                         2