Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 32] [Entire Act]

State of Uttarakhand - Section

Section 3 in Uttarakhand Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 2005

3. Fraudulent default by Financial Establishment.

- Any Financial Establishment, which fraudulently defaults any repayment or deposit on maturity along with any benefit in the form of interest, bonus, profit or in any other form as promised or fraudulently fails to render service as assured against the deposit, every person including the promoter partner, director, manager or any other person or an employee responsible for the management of or conduction of the business or affairs of such Financial Establishment shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six years and with fine which may extend to one lakh of rupees and such Financial Establishment shall also be liable for a fine which may extend to an amount equivalent to rupees five lakhs or where such deposit is quantifiable in terms of money twice the amount involved in such default, whichever is more:Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons recorded in the judgment of the court, the imprisonment shall not be less than three years and the fine shall not be less than rupees twenty thousand as against each individual and not less than rupees on lakh against such Financial Establishment.Explanation. - For the purpose of this section, a Financial Establishment, which commits default in repayment of such deposit with such benefits in the form of interest, bonus, profit or in any other form as promised or fails to render any specified service promised against such deposit, or fails to render any specific service agreed against the deposit with an intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person or commits such defaults due to its inability arising out of impracticable or commercially not viable promised made while accepting such deposit or arising out of deployment of money or assets acquired out of the deposits in such a manner as it involves inherent risk in recovering the same when needed, shall be deemed to have committed a default or failed to render the specific service, fraudulently.