Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

M.Shiva Ramuiamma vs The State Of Andhrapradesh, on 28 September, 2022

WD
aed om
By G
we he oe
uy ES fan ~
Vi TA al
: 63m Z weal a
} 3 bed S 2
aS tone, 4

3 g

Se: : + ch Z 2

fi = 6 fA 8 a ze

rene te --- 3 a ie

bad pn, >. aM "3 ci

ed ed 3 $2.

oO - & = os £2 oe, i 55 3

pn bh, yee bes 75 we esd Ko ts

fone os pe . Ze. $ Us ae posed take

7 : ff des vagy ee % Fs i i

; ye % aan 28 vn ay m ~,

Bab. _& & ae 68 Be & £3 0

Pe Gt By age "eS eases mH "ee we oA

cA apg pe Fe .! pron Sen ge 8S CS. ae oo eet aye te
60 he pth Be » ABgee cee ay tk hy 4 = --
"n pr of ee : as Peeog i on ees! wh rs i iG oe
cae x or toa ; {fh tee ie 2 is 3 & nS

ened
a
Ne
a

ama CN
p

WRIT PETITION No. 28070 of 2022

oh.
wv
a is
ae Sky
3 wen ; ot mx GE, a a
woh ie a Tew oe £5 R GO ch ge ge C
cae: See 7 A 3 oe BAM BY mB gy @ OD a
ae ab ad . be os £. Bom EO Or & 5 ~e G
Se Ee gg % ag 6 8 Boll gfe 2 . & 2 &
5 _ > ce ae ay Oy ae nes Y oy ae c3
i En age ae & ae meg =O aw a. Che RSgeea ae
} She a oS '3 ara ' A toe at
& 2% co BE, os && Greg Soh S68, By 2:
nt a 'bed 2 ES Sh Re ee he OBS Ey wm 2 me $e od
: ae gn) ge eee ae 63 wee GE LS iS wm ty rm a OS 7?
cond ta TC vk Re Son EG nL aed wy we. * My pee eS po
me Be a3 te TOR ~ fu! Pan Be Pe ee ad woe eG ol
sors yon eed "OO ois a fe FS ow o Od BOF AS ras ee
cs ell Ps ae Se » 2 OY ity SE peop fe a any fe oe
hal ae ae @ un G ee FS te ag ar an 2 fe
i. ee ot fa 3 gs. RE om ty mers be *y is. 73 43 Cy 5 45 £3, a
Be eg fe 3 thE met ge Os i Gy he MO BS 2 a
kale oh - fy <2 EA Mp 2 ES aw 3 og ay hes 8S tn £2 3 ia
; : " boc he eM 2 ss & iy ke A ME ie)
a Co me OE wo fr FE 8, ve, 8 PY wy 9 MD Fa
--o apn vias ae Gb me ee "Ai 4 Seg 13 oes aad tes By
Boe on Ae nf "ye é ee 2 as vere ey ES re
os ify A &%. oe oy OE YM UA we OX wl eo mee
ha iad we LD 1 oe SI 1 xx, Coe GY a TENS: » SY ws
= on ee ME ee me EG ry oh, EE. a a ee
we view. $ whee faphn al
$ave F . . ; ' 5 : ; mm

>
.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

Between

Miesedésdaseig,

weeraenrnnate


Bon

rick

ot

He
N
Aw ak

j

oes
rs

. a
: iS
t a3
; 2B
gt
: Poin
aed
nt
a" ra
gees
we tem, uaa



_

G " oe
5 63 es

5 ee}
wre oh
*S ae

ne oe

i
s

: " ; wb aa
ae : 763 4% é ase 5
% fe 49 ay yer G £23 on
on 3 4 as ee ay pss rs ped
ey Seg amie $B a. . B . f agh . : cS ogite ar
& he. 4 i iad Foon peed "ES ft
v4 a ~ i: . 3 tt beh
3 2 : fa bes a x ac : as x
ne . Z s weet ee ES 4 canoe ree "
he oy as wh. ea) ae 2 G as aS
©. an, a is ne GS ; if; '
a iy A ty "4 co £ om
"cepa cat 4
bon * cy .

"ye
aR
H
wah
on
7 Ax

e

~
gw
iB

«
pad
wi
mi IN

&
t
t
t

UTIaLr
s 7
adu ,
cerhy WAP
une

ar

e

at a wee 4S wy
s . § at , i rst i we fe
f Sh oe ss 25 as re
f te ae Zz, "ke ts a Ramee 6
"ory ed ne sG ae ee he as $4 42 al
& OX cg io £3 eae e bem nn on
om we "ze * na "5 mere CC
oo i © a moO boc cS 2 ae &
eae a ac. 35 oe ie ss se oe fe of
ey ee Oh, po res te £5 A Be m
: Ch oy at oe o Be os Sg, eB
ee Te ee ad 28 wee Ba eet mo 2m TS U3 RR
ea 2 ze i le cy BE moe 8 as am
on 0 BPO fan "Se bee C7, SOR Bee lt he Spe SF
a1 o an + ee fb oo nm ae aad A coe EF See wa
beh 5 at we mn ae " poe "a gey as BO ey ORE
2A BBE 'A peas : BEG pRB ine
ae ge on se im wena' ne ;
OS ao TG ees Xs ee B a S43 fa et te
~ nk he ys 73. it. Syd wi . Fs Ss so Sy Fy
Se x OG i) ~ eg ie iS Ee & ~ AD
Ce Oe aS es "ED a3 ag A po 163 oe SOF core Sept ons
iis % 4 4 f or 3 tt te TES vtnce GS G5 mE PS
oof iT i OG ue mah, Be pad $ 1 Me [os rr 4 Sy?
a BS een ae 'S 3 , pan EL age SZ a Kore G3 vy
peg coheed rh nee. 2 Dam oy: oe ae ~ ES a. : ad .
BO ot ony ae ED Ox ae cs at of rH ny a UE
ih Se, oR Np pay Gh £44 UF Me hy OF sm me OSG vy OSS} nid ORG
e Be we Qs molt AED pares Se oe en hy i: a pe as Sac
Bos, Ty me ae , fa her a ve ke ~
; P . ; ee . . a
4 af 's , t Fas Co aed os cet
a a A ol A ee 4 mA os os
ae a 7 i

.

ota

z

AG 3

a

AR

f

As
peyfo

t

:

mavethi

3

"3

Pad

a

m

t

4,

oo

>


or

a
roe

Yo

TAR

as

g



7. Sujatha, W/o. Subba Raju, Age d about 4§ years, Ria. Valluru,
" yallura Mandal. ¥SR Kadana District,
46. P. Rajeswaramma Wa, Shiva Reddy, Aged about 50 years,
Rio. Bevalampalle, Kurnoothala Mandal, YSR Kadapa Distr ct,
49.7. Gangulamma, W/o, Rarnana, Aged about 44 years, Ria. Valluru,
Valluru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District,

AND
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical &
Farmnly Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapuds, Amaravall.
2. The District Collector YSR Kadanas Distric "t, Kadana.
3. The Commissioner, Comrnissiongerate of Health & Family Welfare, 5° Floor,
APHC Towers, Mangalagir, Guntur Dist uriet, A.P.
oe Directer, Medical & Family Welfare Department, 3°° Floor,
One Center, Himange | Towers, Sai Puram Colony , Gollapudi,
¥ilayawada, NTR District, ALP.
5. The District Medical and Health Of} cer, Medical & Farnily Welfare Department,
Kacdapa, YSR Kadapa District.
6. The District Collector, Annarmayya District t, Tirupati.

Respondents,

Petition under Article | 226 0 of the Canstituiien of india is Aled
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order or CHrection more particularly one in
the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent authorities not fo conduct

counseling in pursuance of the impugned Proceedings vide Reo No Spveskoe2
dated 06.08.2022 as the same is i legal, arbitrary and without giving any aenple
apportunity fo the Pettioners fo ventilate thelr grievance and H is aimed af iowerin
down the prasant position of the petitioners frorn their actual position of Mult
Purpose Nealth Assistant (Female) by infedrating therm in vilageAvard Secretariats in
YSR Kadapa Distrat whic sh is in vinlaticn of Arnticie 14, 79 and 21 of the Consitution
af india and order for stoppag e of all further probeecings in pursuance of impugned
Proceedings vide R.co.No Sol/E2/e022 dated 06.08.2022 by setting asice the same

LANo. tof 2022:

Pelition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that | in fhe ocircurnstanices
stated in the affidavit fled In support of fhe writ petition, the Nigh Court may be
pleagad io pass an interim order by suspending the imougned Proceedings vide
Re.Ne, Spl. (e2fm0ad dated 06.08.2022 issued by the Respondent Ne. §&, pending
disposal of WLP. Ne. 28010 of 2022, anths file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing,cugon perusing the Petition and the afilavit Med
in support thereof and the Oreler of the High court df. 02.09. 2022.8 27.09 2022 and upon
hearing the argumenis of BRI SATY ANARAYANA NIMMALA Advocate for ihe Peitioners
and of the Govt. Pleader for Services-JV forthe Respondents the Gourl made the fo! leaving.

ees



ORDER :

"At request of learned counsel far the petitioner, post on P2170. 7022. interim order granted earlier is extended HH then, _ Sd M. SRINFVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1. Twa CCs to the G.P. for Services-lV, High Court of A.P., at Amaravat(OUT}

2.Qne CC to Sri Satyanarayana Nimmaia, Advacate({OPuc} a a:

Sih HIGH COURT DRL RMR.
OT. 28-09-2023, POST ON 72.70.2022 W.PLNo. 28010 of 2022 EXTENSION OF EARLIER INTERIM ORDER