Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Basdeo Tiwari Alias Basudeo Tiwari ... vs The State Of Jharkhand Through Cbi on 22 March, 2013

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI                          B.A. No. 9929 of 2012  Basdeo Tiwari @ Basudeo Tiwari @ Bashudeo Tiwari       ......Petitioner                   Versus  The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I.          ...... Opposite Party                                          ­­­­­­­­­ CORAM:  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY ­­­­­­­­­ For the Petitioner           : Mr.  Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate For the State           : A.P.P. ­­­­­­­­­­­­  07 /22.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The   petitioner   is   accused   in   connection   with   R.C.   Case  No.20(A)/2009(R),   pending   in   the   Court   of   Sri   A.K.   Gupta,   learned   Special  Judge, C.B.I., Ranchi.  

It   is   alleged   in   the   F.I.R.   that   petitioner,   then   being   the   Executive  Engineer, R.C.D., Chaibasa during the period 2006­07 entered into a criminal  conspiracy   with   M/s   Nav   Nirman   Builders   to   whom   contract   was   given   to  construct road.   It is disclosed that M/s Nav Nirman Builders submitted false  and bogus invoices showing procurement of bitumen for the execution of the  contractual work, allotted in its favour and petitioner, in connivance with the  contractor   and   other   accused,   certified   those   bills   based   on   those   invoices  causing wrongful lose to the Government of Jharkhand and for wrongful gain to  the contractor and other accused.  It is further disclosed that out of 37 invoices  showing procurement of bitumen from I.O.C.L. Depot, Tata Nagar, 06 invoices  covering 27.234 M.T. procured bitumen were not actually issued by the I.O.C.L.  Depot,   Tata   Nagar   and   hence   prima   facie   those   bills   were   considered   to   be  forged and fabricated.  It is further alleged that on the basis of false certification  of the above noted invoices and bills, the contractor has received payment of  Rs.89,68,966/­. 

It is submitted that the contractor was given the job to complete the work  within   21   days.     He   had   used   the   bitumen   which   were   already   in   stock  purchased from H.P.C.L.  Initially only on the suspicion the C.B.I. has registered  this case u/s 420, 120­B, 467, 468 & 472 of the Indian Penal Code and Section  13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act but after  investigation chargehseet has only been submitted for the offences punishable  under   Prevention   of   Corruption   Act   because   the   bills   submitted   by   the  contractor were found genuine and issued by said company.  Furthermore, the  2. contractor   namely   Dharmveer   Bhadoria   has   been   granted   bail   by   learned  Special Judge, C.B.I. in view of the direction given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in  S.L.P. No.5737 of 2012.  It is further pointed out that Ram Vilash Sahu, one of  the Assistant Engineer posted at the relevant time at the said place has also  been granted bail by this Court vide B.A. No.6859 of 2012.  

On   the   other   hand,   learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   C.B.I.   has  vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that 37 invoices relating  to bitumen purchased by the contractor were actually issued against a different  contract   work   relating   to   National   Highway   Division,   Jamshedpure   on   the  strength   of   authority   letter   issued   by   the   Executive   Engineer   of   National  Highway Division, Jamshedpur.   The photo copy of those bills and invoices in  connection   with   this   case   were   certified   by   this   petitioner   and   after   that  payment was made to the contractor.  Therefore, petitioner, being the Executive  Engineer, cannot escape from the liability.

Be that as it may, it was the contractor who had used those 37 invoices  for two different contract for getting payment and he has been granted regular  bail on his surrender in view of the order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court.  The   petitioner   has   already   remained   in   custody   for   about   eight   months   and  another   co­accused   Ram   Vilash   Sahu   has   been   granted   bail   by   this   Court.  Considering all these aspects, petitioner Basdeo Tiwari @ Basudeo Tiwari @  Bashudeo Tiwari  is directed to   be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of  Rs.20,000/­(Rupees   twenty   Thousand)   with   two   sureties   of   the   like   amount  each to the satisfaction of the Court of Sri A.K. Gupta, learned Special Judge,  C.B.I., Ranchi in connection with R.C. Case No.20(A)/2009(R).

                          (D. N. Upadhyay, J.)                 NKC