Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Divisional Manager National Insurance ... vs M Ayyab Khan S/O Enayathkhan on 6 June, 2008

Author: Anand Byrareddy

Bench: Anand Byrareddy

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT   

DATED THIS THE 6"' DAY m      V " 

BEP0g.:%_   %   %
THE HON'BLE MR. ms'1'1c§;ANANn 

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST  or 2aoc;(%Mg)

Divisional   'V    
Nationai Insurance_Ci?1i¥PflIiSr' '   '_  
Limited,  »-:::::,:  " ' 
BilgundiCm upk=x,   .
Gulbarga, nowrepresr:nte<"i    ,, 4 " 
Byi1sR¢:giunal Manager,  ,. 
Nafional Insurance.  V' "
Limited, Rhgiunal Offiags,
Subharam Compie-7;, A
144, M;G._}(u_ad«,_ » ' . __
Bafig3}¢;g;5,fi.}..Qfi1V_v'~,._VV_:'.  APPELLANT

   _(I33rV$h:i. E" for Shri. AN. Krishnaswamy, Advocate)

._.x

'   '  :'B'tI.;V"5i.3/ytzatla Khan,

s:*o' Exiayatltkhalx,

 'Nuw aged about 41 yaars,
  ~0cc~Busincss,
" Resident of Murhaxi Camp,

Gangavaizizi.

8



2. Ravikumar,

son of Sharanappa,
major, Occ-Business
& Owner of Vehicle
Nu.KA-37/K-305,
Resident of Shri Laxmi

Venkal-3P¥Id:naTradef'-4,      
CBS Gunj Gangavathi.   Z . ,.   it f

(By Shri. H.N. Kasai, Advusatu fiK..Rcs;fi):.I__¢tcnt 1}"    ti %

tttifi " »

This Misi::;}lén§tau's..:E§i3t  is filed amdtsr Section
173(1) of th£:f_Mo1;;or V*ahib£<j;sA_1Xct against the judgement and
award   pnsmed in'-MV(1.No.l 5/'Z005 cm the file of
the Civii  fitirésitvn) mid Molar Accidents Claims
Tribunal;_G9ngava1hi,«..awa:dixig compensation of Rs.1,90,000/--
with intcifisi. at 9%. pm)' l'r.i3:¥,tv:"tl1t: date: of filing the  till
realisation. " "   

.;i'his:»: Appeal  on far admission this day, the Court

V. A ' ' V _ _V  the --f§iiowing: -

JQflGMEETr

 ..   cuming on liar admissitm and the respondent

served, the primary gonad on which the $1 is ' is that though the appellant had cxmtcudcxi am the claimant had suffered serious injuries at the am.-idesnt, them: was an bani:-; al§¢-Mad {hr eiaimiaa the auanium Hf etwnnemsatiem and 55 :;sidc,..__h¢:vwcver with liberty to the claimant fresh evidence as mgards his disabiity and . tawail lhe of the fresh proceedings mallet be remanded to the Tribunal in enable adduue cvidmcc in support of his clairiif ' « Q_

3. This plan being a {air ira. §}ac:VVVinteru:s1 A ufjusticcs, lhuugh me @..,;:....¢ i9." gpheza, ii is appmp11a° 1.: that am» mus; Tribunal with liberty its the fresh mum" on as regards

4. allowed. The award uf me tin deposit be mmitted lo the uibuuul to SR